CGMS ranks 2nd and THRV 5th of 7 funds in the Conservative Allocation Category.
CGMS vs THRV
CGMS −1.41pt a year
0.39%1.80%
CGMS 323.6×the volume
1.2M3.7K
CGMS vs THRV Performance
+1.6%−0.2%
- CGMS 0.39%, better
- THRV 1.80%
- CGMS $5.61B
- THRV $8M
- CGMS +1.6%, better
- THRV −0.2%
- CGMS 6.69%
- THRV
- CGMS 1548
- THRV 63
- CGMS 1.2M sh, better
- THRV 3.7K sh
- CGMS $26.40
- THRV $23.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGMS | THRV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A75Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A82 | A97Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | A75 |
| Durability | A72Higher | D29 |
Rank among Conservative Allocation funds
Same Category. CGMS and THRV are both graded against the same 7 Conservative Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGMSA
THRVC
In short
CGMS Capital Group's bond desk in ETF form: one ticket across the income-producing corners of the US market, roughly 1,200 positions deep, paying monthly. Income first, capital appreciation second.
THRV An active manager builds an income portfolio out of other funds: bond ETFs, closed-end funds, dividend payers, ADRs, commodities. One ticker, a plain mandate (income with capital preservation), and a premium price tag.
Stated mandate
CGMS The fund seeks a high level of current income, with capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
THRV The Fund seeks to generate income while preserving capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGMS vs THRV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGMS vs THRV Cost
Overpaying THRV vs CGMS
$22,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGMS 0.39%
$7,898
THRV 1.80%
$30,364
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGMS | THRV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $3,070 | $2,365 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $11,135 | $8,410 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $30,364 | $22,466 |
- 0.39%CGMS, cheaper
- 1.80%THRV
- Middle half of Conservative Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
CGMS 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
THRV 7th cheapest of 7 funds
CGMS vs THRV Dividends
- CGMS 6.69%
- THRV
- CGMS $1.77
- THRV
- CGMS $0.12
- THRV $0.16
- CGMS Oct 30, 2026
- THRV Oct 19, 2026
- CGMS Pays Nov 2, 2026
- THRV Oct 20, 2026
- CGMS Monthly
- THRV Monthly
Distribution history
CGMS vs THRV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGMS 4.7%THRV 2.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGMS 0.71THRV −1.28
- Worst fall
- CGMS −4.1%THRV −3.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CGMS 0.72THRV 0.10
CGMS and THRV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.80% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.80% · 0.67%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.80% · 1.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

