Skip to content

CGMS vs THRV

Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF

CGMSANYSE Arca

Prospera Income ETF

THRVCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

CGMS −1.41pt a year

CGMS0.39%THRV1.80%

Avg volume · 30D

CGMS 323.6×the volume

CGMS1.2MTHRV3.7K

CGMS vs THRV Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.6%CGMS−0.2%THRV

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CGMS +1.6%. THRV −0.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1%1%3%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CGMS 0.39%, better
THRV 1.80%
Fund size
CGMS $5.61B
THRV $8M
1Y total return
CGMS +1.6%, better
THRV −0.2%
Yield (12M)
CGMS 6.69%
THRV No data
Holdings
CGMS 1548
THRV 63
Avg volume (30D)
CGMS 1.2M sh, better
THRV 3.7K sh
NAV per share
CGMS $26.40
THRV $23.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGMS: Cost 75, Risk 68, Mission 82, Tradability 74, Holdings 84, Durability 72. THRV: Cost 8, Risk 41, Mission 97, Tradability 33, Holdings 75, Durability 29.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGMS, THRV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGMSTHRV
Cost30% weightA75HigherF8
Mission25% weightA82A97Higher
Risk15% weightB68HigherC41
Tradability15% weightA74HigherD33
Holdings10% weightA84HigherA75
Durability5% weightA72HigherD29

Rank among Conservative Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGMS and THRV are both graded against the same 7 Conservative Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Conservative Allocation⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

CGMS ranks 2nd and THRV 5th of 7 funds in the Conservative Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AAOKiShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ACGMSCapital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3CBLUIBluemonte Diversified Income ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 4CXRLXFundX Investment Conservative ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 5CTHRVProspera Income ETFScore 46
  6. Rank 6CMFULMindful Conservative ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGMSACapital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF

THRVCProspera Income ETF

In short

CGMS Capital Group's bond desk in ETF form: one ticket across the income-producing corners of the US market, roughly 1,200 positions deep, paying monthly. Income first, capital appreciation second.

THRV An active manager builds an income portfolio out of other funds: bond ETFs, closed-end funds, dividend payers, ADRs, commodities. One ticker, a plain mandate (income with capital preservation), and a premium price tag.

Stated mandate

CGMS The fund seeks a high level of current income, with capital appreciation as a secondary objective.

THRV The Fund seeks to generate income while preserving capital.

Why people hold it

  • CGMS Charges 0.39% a year, below the median for its conservative-income peer group.
  • Spread across roughly 1,200 holdings, so no single issuer carries the portfolio.
  • Pays monthly, and with multi-billion-dollar scale and steady trading it's one of the easier funds in its cohort to move in and out of.
  • Sits among the strongest implementations in its small conservative-income peer group.
  • THRV Unusual reach for a conservative income fund: the manager can buy closed-end funds and commodities, corners most bond-heavy income ETFs leave alone.yahoo.com
  • The mandate is plain English: generate income while preserving capital. No index to shadow, no derivatives overlay to decode.
  • Actively managed, so the mix of bond funds, stocks and hard assets can be reshuffled as income opportunities move, rather than waiting on an index rebalance.yahoo.com
  • Live since 2017, a real operating history rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • CGMS Income is the mandate: the fund seeks a high level of current income, with capital appreciation only a secondary objective.capitalgroup.com
  • Cheaper doors exist in the cohort. BLUI runs 0.25%.
  • Launched in late 2022, so the track record is short next to long-running multi-sector bond funds.
  • THRV At 1.80% a year the fee sits far above cohort names like BLUI (0.25%) and CGMS (0.39%), and it stacks on top of the fees of the funds it holds.yahoo.com
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can be wide. Limit orders are the norm here.
  • Distributions come on an irregular schedule, not a set monthly rhythm, and the fund is non-diversified, so single positions can carry real weight.yahoo.com

Full CGMS profile⁠

Full THRV profile⁠

CGMS vs THRV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGMS vs THRV Cost

Overpaying THRV vs CGMS

$22,466

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGMS 0.39%

    $7,898

  • THRV 1.80%

    $30,364

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGMS 0.39%
  • THRV 1.80%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K051015202530THRV $30,364CGMS $7,898

Year by year

YearCGMSTHRVOverpaying
10$705$3,070$2,365
20$2,725$11,135$8,410
30$7,898$30,364$22,466

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%CGMS, cheaper
  • 1.80%THRV
  • Middle half of Conservative Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CGMS 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

THRV 7th cheapest of 7 funds

CGMS vs THRV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGMS 6.69%
THRV No data
Payout (12M)
CGMS $1.77
THRV No data
Last payment
CGMS $0.12
THRV $0.16
Ex-dividend
CGMS Oct 30, 2026
THRV Oct 19, 2026
Paid on
CGMS Pays Nov 2, 2026
THRV Oct 20, 2026
Frequency
CGMS Monthly
THRV Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CGMSMonthly · 46 paymentsAll CGMS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 31, 2023 $0.10; Feb 28, 2023 $0.09; Mar 31, 2023 $0.15; Apr 28, 2023 $0.12; May 31, 2023 $0.15; Jun 30, 2023 $0.12; Jul 31, 2023 $0.12; Aug 31, 2023 $0.14; Sep 29, 2023 $0.13; Oct 31, 2023 $0.15; Nov 30, 2023 $0.12; Dec 28, 2023 $0.17; Jan 31, 2024 $0.14; Feb 29, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.13; Apr 30, 2024 $0.14; May 31, 2024 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Jul 31, 2024 $0.15; Aug 30, 2024 $0.12; Sep 27, 2024 $0.11; Oct 31, 2024 $0.14; Nov 29, 2024 $0.13; Dec 24, 2024 $0.17; Jan 31, 2025 $0.11; Feb 28, 2025 $0.12; Mar 28, 2025 $0.14; Apr 30, 2025 $0.14; May 30, 2025 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.14; Jul 31, 2025 $0.19; Aug 29, 2025 $0.14; Sep 29, 2025 $0.13; Oct 31, 2025 $0.17; Nov 28, 2025 $0.13; Dec 24, 2025 $0.17; Jan 30, 2026 $0.11; Feb 27, 2026 $0.11; Mar 30, 2026 $0.10; Apr 30, 2026 $0.15; May 29, 2026 $0.14; Jun 29, 2026 $0.14; Jul 31, 2026 $0.16; Aug 31, 2026 $0.13; Sep 29, 2026 $0.14; Oct 30, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
THRVMonthly · 13 paymentsAll THRV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Nov 18, 2025 $0.16; Dec 18, 2025 $0.17; Dec 30, 2025 $0.08; Jan 21, 2026 $0.10; Feb 18, 2026 $0.16; Mar 18, 2026 $0.16; Apr 20, 2026 $0.16; May 19, 2026 $0.16; Jun 18, 2026 $0.16; Jul 20, 2026 $0.16; Aug 18, 2026 $0.16; Sep 18, 2026 $0.16; Oct 19, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

CGMS vs THRV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGMS 4.7%THRV 2.9%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGMS 0.71THRV −1.28since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGMS −4.1%since Oct 2022THRV −3.3%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGMS 0.72THRV 0.10

CGMS and THRV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CGMSAvsAOKA

    Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF · iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THRVCvsAOKA

    Prospera Income ETF · iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.80% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGMSAvsBLUIC

    Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF · Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.67%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THRVCvsBLUIC

    Prospera Income ETF · Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.80% · 0.67%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGMSAvsXRLXC

    Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF · FundX Investment Conservative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 1.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THRVCvsXRLXC

    Prospera Income ETF · FundX Investment Conservative ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.80% · 1.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.