Skip to content

ARP vs NTSX

PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF

ARPDNYSE Arca

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

NTSXANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

NTSX −1.20pt a year

ARP1.42%NTSX0.22%

Avg volume · 30D

NTSX 5.0×the volume

ARP8.67KNTSX42.9K

3Y return · a year

NTSX +4.9pt

ARP+15.2%NTSX+20.1%

ARP vs NTSX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.8%ARP+7.5%NTSX

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. ARP +12.8%. NTSX +7.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ARP 1.42%
NTSX 0.22%, better
Fund size
ARP $74M
NTSX $1.34B
1Y total return
ARP +12.8%, better
NTSX +7.5%
Yield (12M)
ARP 5.92%, better
NTSX 1.07%
Holdings
ARP 7
NTSX 504
Avg volume (30D)
ARP 8.67K sh
NTSX 42.9K sh, better
NAV per share
ARP $33.78
NTSX $58.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARP: Cost 6, Risk 80, Mission 30, Tradability 53, Holdings 42, Durability 49. NTSX: Cost 89, Risk 64, Mission 98, Tradability 72, Holdings 72, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARP, NTSX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARPNTSX
Cost30% weightF6A89Higher
Mission25% weightD30A98Higher
Risk15% weightA80HigherB64
Tradability15% weightC53A72Higher
Holdings10% weightC42A72Higher
Durability5% weightC49A93Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARP and NTSX are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

NTSX ranks 1st and ARP 13th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 12CRSSTReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETFScore 41
  4. Rank 13DARPPMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETFScore 37
  5. Rank 14DRSBTReturn Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARPDPMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF

NTSXAWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

In short

ARP Most capital-efficient multi-asset funds stack stocks on Treasury futures. ARP goes the other way: an actively managed all-weather portfolio that spreads risk across asset classes, then tilts toward whatever is already trending.

NTSX Stocks and Treasuries stacked on the same dollar. NTSX owns roughly 500 large U.S. companies, then layers Treasury futures on top, so one line item does the work of a balanced portfolio. Running since 2018.

Stated mandate

ARP The Fund seeks capital appreciation while aiming for lower volatility and less correlation with the overall equity market. It pursues this through active, trend-aware allocation across multiple asset classes.

NTSX The Fund seeks total return through investments in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

Why people hold it

  • ARP Risk parity with a momentum overlay: PMV balances risk across the growth and inflation drivers of returns, then shifts allocations toward asset classes already trending.prnewswire.com
  • Diversification is the mandate, not a side effect: it reaches across US, developed ex-US and emerging markets and multiple asset classes, aiming for low correlation to stocks.
  • An oddity on this shelf, where most funds lever a stock-and-Treasury-futures core (NTSX, NTSI). ARP's trend-aware risk parity is not anchored to equities.
  • NTSX Costs 0.20% a year, while the typical fund in its allocation peer group charges closer to four times that.
  • The equity sleeve is a plain large-cap U.S. portfolio of roughly 500 names. The Treasury futures ride alongside as collateralized exposure, not as a stock-picking bet.wisdomtree.com
  • Delivers its stated mandate with very little drift, and rates among the strongest builds in a crowded field of allocation funds.
  • Sibling GDE runs the same capital-efficient playbook at the same 0.20% fee, swapping the Treasury leg for gold, if you want the mechanism pointed elsewhere.

Worth knowing

  • ARP The trade-off is cost: 1.42% net of a waiver through February 28, 2027 (1.88% gross), above the category median, where NTSX charges 0.20%.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so spreads can be wider and sizable orders can move the price more than in the category's household names.
  • Actively managed with no index to track: the mix follows PMV's trend signals, and distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • NTSX Futures mean total market exposure runs above the fund's actual assets. When stocks and Treasuries fall together, the drop lands harder than in an unlevered balanced fund.
  • Trades thinly for a multi-billion-dollar fund. Limit orders and quieter parts of the session matter more here than with the mega-cap index crowd.
  • Income is a side effect of the structure, not the goal. Distributions come quarterly.

Full ARP profile⁠

Full NTSX profile⁠

ARP vs NTSX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARP vs NTSX Cost

Overpaying ARP vs NTSX

$20,579

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARP 1.42%

    $25,137

  • NTSX 0.22%

    $4,558

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARP 1.42%
  • NTSX 0.22%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ARP $25,137NTSX $4,558

Year by year

YearARPNTSXOverpaying
10$2,460$401$2,059
20$9,074$1,561$7,513
30$25,137$4,558$20,579

Expense ratio

  • 1.42%ARP
  • 0.22%NTSX, cheaper
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

NTSX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

ARP 18th cheapest of 19 funds

ARP vs NTSX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
ARP 5.92%, better
NTSX 1.07%
Payout (12M)
ARP $1.97
NTSX $0.63
Last payment
ARP $1.97
NTSX $0.16
Ex-dividend
ARP Dec 30, 2025
NTSX Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
ARP Jan 7, 2026
NTSX Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
ARP Annual
NTSX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

ARPAnnual · 4 paymentsAll ARP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2022 $0.01; Dec 28, 2023 $0.67; Dec 30, 2024 $1.44; Dec 30, 2025 $1.97. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2202020232026YTD
NTSXQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll NTSX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 24, 2018 $0.08; Mar 26, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2019 $0.10; Sep 24, 2019 $0.04; Dec 9, 2019 $0.11; Dec 23, 2019 $0.12; Mar 24, 2020 $0.04; Jun 23, 2020 $0.08; Sep 22, 2020 $0.09; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 24, 2021 $0.09; Sep 24, 2021 $0.09; Dec 27, 2021 $0.10; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.12; Sep 26, 2022 $0.12; Dec 23, 2022 $0.12; Mar 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 26, 2023 $0.11; Sep 25, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 22, 2024 $0.11; Jun 25, 2024 $0.13; Sep 25, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.16; Sep 25, 2025 $0.17; Dec 26, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.15; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 25, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2202020232026YTD

ARP vs NTSX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARP 8.7%, betterNTSX 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARP 1.24NTSX 1.28, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARP −10.1%since Dec 2022NTSX −31.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARP 0.70NTSX 1.04

Popular comparisons

  • ARPDvsCTAPA

    PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.42% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsCTAPA

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARPDvsGDEB

    PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.42% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsGDEB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARPDvsNTSIB

    PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.42% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.