NTSI ranks 4th and ARP 13th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
ARP vs NTSI
NTSI −1.14pt a year
1.42%0.28%
NTSI 2.2×the volume
8.67K18.9K
NTSI +1.3pt
+15.2%+16.5%
ARP vs NTSI Performance
+12.8%+10.4%
- ARP 1.42%
- NTSI 0.28%, better
- ARP $74M
- NTSI $488M
- ARP +12.8%, better
- NTSI +10.4%
- ARP 5.92%, better
- NTSI 3.11%
- ARP 7
- NTSI 458
- ARP 8.67K sh
- NTSI 18.9K sh, better
- ARP $33.78
- NTSI $46.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARP | NTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A83Higher |
| Mission | D30 | |
| Risk | A80Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | C53Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | C42 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C49 | A70Higher |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. ARP and NTSI are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARPD
NTSIB
In short
ARP Most capital-efficient multi-asset funds stack stocks on Treasury futures. ARP goes the other way: an actively managed all-weather portfolio that spreads risk across asset classes, then tilts toward whatever is already trending.
NTSI Developed-market stocks and a U.S. Treasury futures sleeve sharing one seat. NTSI is WisdomTree's capital-efficient playbook pointed overseas: the stock exposure and the bond exposure don't have to compete for the same dollar.
Stated mandate
ARP The Fund seeks capital appreciation while aiming for lower volatility and less correlation with the overall equity market. It pursues this through active, trend-aware allocation across multiple asset classes.
NTSI The Fund seeks total return through international equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. WisdomTree presents it as a capital-efficient balanced strategy intended to provide international equity exposure with Treasury-futures diversification.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARP vs NTSI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARP vs NTSI Cost
Overpaying ARP vs NTSI
$19,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARP 1.42%
$25,137
NTSI 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARP | NTSI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,460 | $509 | $1,951 |
| 20 | $9,074 | $1,976 | $7,098 |
| 30 | $25,137 | $5,755 | $19,382 |
- 1.42%ARP
- 0.28%NTSI, cheaper
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
NTSI 4th cheapest of 19 funds
ARP 18th cheapest of 19 funds
ARP vs NTSI Dividends
- ARP 5.92%, better
- NTSI 3.11%
- ARP $1.97
- NTSI $1.45
- ARP $1.97
- NTSI $0.01
- ARP Dec 30, 2025
- NTSI Sep 25, 2026
- ARP Jan 7, 2026
- NTSI Sep 29, 2026
- ARP Annual
- NTSI Quarterly
Distribution history
ARP vs NTSI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARP 8.7%, betterNTSI 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARP 1.24, betterNTSI 0.99
- Worst fall
- ARP −10.1%NTSI −33.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ARP 0.70NTSI 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 1.42% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.