Skip to content

ARP vs CTAP

PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF

ARPDNYSE Arca

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CTAP −1.29pt a year

ARP1.42%CTAP0.13%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 10.0×the volume

ARP8.67KCTAP86.8K

ARP vs CTAP Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%ARP+21.5%CTAP

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ARP +11.8%. CTAP +21.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%25%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARP 1.42%
CTAP 0.13%, better
Fund size
ARP $74M
CTAP $167M
1Y total return
ARP +14.1%
CTAP No data
Yield (12M)
ARP 5.85%
CTAP No data
Holdings
ARP 7
CTAP 42
Avg volume (30D)
ARP 8.67K sh
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
NAV per share
ARP $34.16
CTAP $30.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARP: Cost 6, Risk 78, Mission 30, Tradability 53, Holdings 42, Durability 49. CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARP, CTAP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARPCTAP
Cost30% weightF6A100Higher
Mission25% weightD30Not scored
Risk15% weightA78HigherC45
Tradability15% weightC53B67Higher
Holdings10% weightC42C42
Durability5% weightC49B59Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARP and CTAP are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and ARP 13th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 12CRSSTReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 13DARPPMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETFScore 37
  6. Rank 14DRSBTReturn Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARPDPMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

In short

ARP Most capital-efficient multi-asset funds stack stocks on Treasury futures. ARP goes the other way: an actively managed all-weather portfolio that spreads risk across asset classes, then tilts toward whatever is already trending.

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

Stated mandate

ARP The Fund seeks capital appreciation while aiming for lower volatility and less correlation with the overall equity market. It pursues this through active, trend-aware allocation across multiple asset classes.

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

Why people hold it

  • ARP Risk parity with a momentum overlay: PMV balances risk across the growth and inflation drivers of returns, then shifts allocations toward asset classes already trending.prnewswire.com
  • Diversification is the mandate, not a side effect: it reaches across US, developed ex-US and emerging markets and multiple asset classes, aiming for low correlation to stocks.
  • An oddity on this shelf, where most funds lever a stock-and-Treasury-futures core (NTSX, NTSI). ARP's trend-aware risk parity is not anchored to equities.
  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.

Worth knowing

  • ARP The trade-off is cost: 1.42% net of a waiver through February 28, 2027 (1.88% gross), above the category median, where NTSX charges 0.20%.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so spreads can be wider and sizable orders can move the price more than in the category's household names.
  • Actively managed with no index to track: the mix follows PMV's trend signals, and distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us

Full ARP profile⁠

Full CTAP profile⁠

ARP vs CTAP Holdings

How ARP and CTAP differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 3.0% of CTAP and 0.0% of ARP.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile90.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors91.0%
  • Asset classAlternatives100%

Sector

Sector weights in ARP and CTAP, widest gap first
SectorMore in ARPMore in CTAP
TechnologyCTAP +5.5 points
IndustrialsARP +3.1 points
FinancialsARP +2.8 points
MaterialsARP +2.0 points
CommunicationCTAP +1.8 points
Health CareCTAP +1.6 points
Consumer StaplesARP +0.7 points
UtilitiesARP +0.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryARP +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
EnergySame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ARP and CTAP, widest gap first
CountryMore in ARPMore in CTAP
United StatesCTAP +9.6 points
JapanARP +2.0 points
United KingdomARP +1.2 points
CanadaARP +1.0 points
South KoreaARP +0.8 points
GermanyARP +0.6 points
NetherlandsARP +0.6 points
FranceARP +0.6 points
Other countries (23)ARP +3.0 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ARP100.0%
  • CTAP228.9%

Securities held

  • ARP6
  • CTAP27

Asset class

ARP
Alternatives
CTAP
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in ARP6
  • In both0
  • Only in CTAP27

Only in ARP

6 securities, 100% of ARP by weight

  • Harbor Commodity All Weather36.11%
  • Vanguard S&P 500 Etf29.14%
  • Wisdomtree Bbg USD Bullish12.20%

Only in CTAP

27 securities, 100% of CTAP by weight

  • Simplify E Govt Money Mkt Etf60.20%
  • Trs Cta 030827 Bullet39.76%
  • Trs Spuc 083127 Bullet24.16%

Weight gaps

ARP and CTAP share no securities.

All ARP holdings⁠All CTAP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARP vs CTAP Cost

Overpaying ARP vs CTAP

$22,411

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARP 1.42%

    $25,137

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARP 1.42%
  • CTAP 0.13%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ARP $25,137CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearARPCTAPOverpaying
10$2,460$238$2,222
20$9,074$930$8,144
30$25,137$2,726$22,411

Expense ratio

  • 1.42%ARP
  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

ARP 18th cheapest of 19 funds

ARP vs CTAP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ARP 5.85%
CTAP No data
Payout (12M)
ARP $1.97
CTAP No data
Last payment
ARP $1.97
CTAP $0.30
Ex-dividend
ARP Dec 30, 2025
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
ARP Jan 7, 2026
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
ARP Annual
CTAP Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

ARPAnnual · 4 paymentsAll ARP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2022 $0.01; Dec 28, 2023 $0.67; Dec 30, 2024 $1.44; Dec 30, 2025 $1.97. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD

ARP vs CTAP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARP 8.7%CTAP No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARP 1.24CTAP No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARP −10.1%since Dec 2022CTAP No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARP 0.70CTAP 1.34

ARP and CTAP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ARPDvsNTSXA

    PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.42% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARPDvsGDEB

    PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.42% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARPDvsNTSIB

    PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.42% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.