FELG ranks 4th and ARWG 79th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
ARWG vs FELG
FELG −0.67pt a year
0.85%0.18%
FELG 199.9×the volume
1.9K379K
ARWG vs FELG Performance
+2.3%+1.6%
- ARWG 0.85%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- ARWG $15M
- FELG $5.78B
- ARWG
- FELG −0.5%
- ARWG
- FELG 0.37%
- ARWG 42
- FELG 133
- ARWG 1.9K sh
- FELG 379K sh, better
- ARWG $25.07
- FELG $42.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARWG | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C54Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | F24 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C52 |
| Durability | F11 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. ARWG and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARWGD
FELGA
In short
ARWG A boutique-run growth fund with a two-sided mandate: own US growth companies while writing capital preservation into the objective itself. Brand new, small, and priced like the active fund it is.
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
Stated mandate
ARWG The Fund seeks long-term total returns while minimizing capital loss.
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARWG vs FELG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARWG vs FELG Cost
Overpaying ARWG vs FELG
$12,450
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARWG 0.85%
$16,199
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARWG | FELG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $328 | $1,180 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $1,281 | $4,425 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $3,749 | $12,450 |
- 0.85%ARWG
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
ARWG 82nd cheapest of 90 funds
ARWG vs FELG Dividends
- ARWG
- FELG 0.37%
- ARWG
- FELG $0.16
- ARWG $0.00067
- FELG $0.04
- ARWG Sep 23, 2026
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- ARWG Sep 24, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- ARWG Twice a year
- FELG Quarterly
Distribution history
ARWG vs FELG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARWG FELG 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARWG FELG 0.93
- Worst fall
- ARWG FELG −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ARWG 0.82FELG 1.23
ARWG and FELG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
