Skip to content
etf.net

ARWG vs GUSE

Archer Growth ETF

ARWGDCboe

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.55pt a year

ARWG0.85%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 13.1×the volume

ARWG1.9KGUSE24.9K

ARWG vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.3%ARWG+11.8%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ARWG +2.3%. GUSE +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARWG 0.85%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
ARWG $15M
GUSE $421M
Holdings
ARWG 42
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
ARWG 1.9K sh
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NAV per share
ARWG $25.07
GUSE $46.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARWG: Cost 7, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings 89, Durability 11. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARWG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARWGGUSE
Cost30% weightF7A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC54A94Higher
Tradability15% weightF24C46Higher
Holdings10% weightA89A89
Durability5% weightF11A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARWG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and ARWG 79th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 77DHYPGolden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETFScore 32
  5. Rank 79DARWGArcher Growth ETFScore 31
  6. Rank 79DNBGXNeuberger Growth ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARWGDArcher Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

ARWG A boutique-run growth fund with a two-sided mandate: own US growth companies while writing capital preservation into the objective itself. Brand new, small, and priced like the active fund it is.

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

ARWG The Fund seeks long-term total returns while minimizing capital loss.

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

  • ARWG The stated objective pairs two goals that usually pull against each other: long-term total return and minimizing capital loss.
  • At least 80% of net assets goes to growth companies chosen for earnings potential, not index weight. Real stock picking across the US market.
  • Portfolio construction is where this fund holds up best against its active US growth peers.
  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • ARWG At 0.85% a year it costs more than the typical active US growth fund. Enhanced-index rivals like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) charge a fraction of that.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads run wider than at the giants. Limit orders are standard practice with funds like this.
  • It launched at the end of 2025, so the loss-minimizing half of the mandate has a short record behind it compared with peers running for years.
  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full ARWG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

ARWG vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARWG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying ARWG vs GUSE

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARWG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARWG 0.85%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ARWG $16,199GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearARWGGUSEOverpaying
10$1,508$545$963
20$5,706$2,113$3,593
30$16,199$6,149$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%ARWG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

ARWG 82nd cheapest of 90 funds

ARWG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
ARWG $0.00067
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
ARWG Sep 23, 2026
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ARWG Sep 24, 2026
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
ARWG Twice a year
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ARWGTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll ARWG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 25, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.00067. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ARWG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARWG 0.82GUSE 0.93

Popular comparisons

  • ARWGDvsJUSAA

    Archer Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARWGDvsLRGCA

    Archer Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARWGDvsFELGA

    Archer Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.