Skip to content
etf.net

ARWG vs JUSA

Archer Growth ETF

ARWGDCboe

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.67pt a year

ARWG0.85%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 52.1×the volume

ARWG1.9KJUSA98.8K

ARWG vs JUSA Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.3%ARWG+10.4%JUSA

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ARWG +2.3%. JUSA +10.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARWG 0.85%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
ARWG $15M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
ARWG No data
JUSA +10.8%
Yield (12M)
ARWG No data
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
ARWG 42
JUSA 263
Avg volume (30D)
ARWG 1.9K sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
ARWG $25.07
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARWG: Cost 7, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings 89, Durability 11. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARWG, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARWGJUSA
Cost30% weightF7A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightC54A92Higher
Tradability15% weightF24B58Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherA84
Durability5% weightF11A76Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARWG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and ARWG 79th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 77DHYPGolden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETFScore 32
  4. Rank 79DARWGArcher Growth ETFScore 31
  5. Rank 79DNBGXNeuberger Growth ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARWGDArcher Growth ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

ARWG A boutique-run growth fund with a two-sided mandate: own US growth companies while writing capital preservation into the objective itself. Brand new, small, and priced like the active fund it is.

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

ARWG The Fund seeks long-term total returns while minimizing capital loss.

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

  • ARWG The stated objective pairs two goals that usually pull against each other: long-term total return and minimizing capital loss.
  • At least 80% of net assets goes to growth companies chosen for earnings potential, not index weight. Real stock picking across the US market.
  • Portfolio construction is where this fund holds up best against its active US growth peers.
  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

  • ARWG At 0.85% a year it costs more than the typical active US growth fund. Enhanced-index rivals like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) charge a fraction of that.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads run wider than at the giants. Limit orders are standard practice with funds like this.
  • It launched at the end of 2025, so the loss-minimizing half of the mandate has a short record behind it compared with peers running for years.
  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full ARWG profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

ARWG vs JUSA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARWG vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying ARWG vs JUSA

$12,450

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARWG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARWG 0.85%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ARWG $16,199JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearARWGJUSAOverpaying
10$1,508$328$1,180
20$5,706$1,281$4,425
30$16,199$3,749$12,450

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%ARWG
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

ARWG 82nd cheapest of 90 funds

ARWG vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ARWG No data
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
ARWG No data
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
ARWG $0.00067
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
ARWG Sep 23, 2026
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
ARWG Sep 24, 2026
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
ARWG Twice a year
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ARWGTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll ARWG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 25, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.00067. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

ARWG vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARWG No dataJUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARWG No dataJUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARWG No dataJUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARWG 0.82JUSA 0.98

ARWG and JUSA in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ARWGDvsGUSEA

    Archer Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARWGDvsLRGCA

    Archer Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARWGDvsFELGA

    Archer Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.