Skip to content
etf.net

ARWG vs LRGC

Archer Growth ETF

ARWGDCboe

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

6.2%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.46pt a year

ARWG0.85%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 18.0×the volume

ARWG1.9KLRGC34.1K

ARWG vs LRGC Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.3%ARWG+9.4%LRGC

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ARWG +2.3%. LRGC +9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARWG 0.85%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
ARWG $15M
LRGC $1.37B
1Y total return
ARWG No data
LRGC +9.5%
Yield (12M)
ARWG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Holdings
ARWG 42
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
ARWG 1.9K sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
ARWG $25.07
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARWG: Cost 7, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings 89, Durability 11. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARWG, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARWGLRGC
Cost30% weightF7A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightC54A90Higher
Tradability15% weightF24A75Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherA77
Durability5% weightF11A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARWG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and ARWG 79th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 77DHYPGolden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETFScore 32
  6. Rank 79DARWGArcher Growth ETFScore 31
  7. Rank 79DNBGXNeuberger Growth ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARWGDArcher Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

ARWG A boutique-run growth fund with a two-sided mandate: own US growth companies while writing capital preservation into the objective itself. Brand new, small, and priced like the active fund it is.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

ARWG The Fund seeks long-term total returns while minimizing capital loss.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • ARWG The stated objective pairs two goals that usually pull against each other: long-term total return and minimizing capital loss.
  • At least 80% of net assets goes to growth companies chosen for earnings potential, not index weight. Real stock picking across the US market.
  • Portfolio construction is where this fund holds up best against its active US growth peers.
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • ARWG At 0.85% a year it costs more than the typical active US growth fund. Enhanced-index rivals like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) charge a fraction of that.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads run wider than at the giants. Limit orders are standard practice with funds like this.
  • It launched at the end of 2025, so the loss-minimizing half of the mandate has a short record behind it compared with peers running for years.
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full ARWG profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

ARWG vs LRGC Holdings

How ARWG and LRGC differ

Overlap by weight

6.2%

Shared holdings make up 10.6% of ARWG and 6.2% of LRGC.

Level by level

  • Holdings5 in both6.2%
  • Countryby domicile96.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for ARWG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ARWG and LRGC, widest gap first
CountryMore in ARWGMore in LRGC
United StatesARWG +4.0 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.2 points
NetherlandsLRGC +1.2 points
United KingdomLRGC +0.8 points
CanadaLRGC +0.7 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ARWG28.8%
  • LRGC42.5%

Securities held

  • ARWG41
  • LRGC71

Asset class

ARWG
Equity
LRGC
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ARWG36
  • In both5
  • Only in LRGC66

Only in ARWG

36 securities, 89.3% of ARWG by weight

  • Zscaler Inc3.34%
  • Appian Corp3.07%
  • Expeditors International of Washington Inc3.01%

Only in LRGC

66 securities, 93.7% of LRGC by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0017.70%
  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006256.93%
  • Apple Inc Common Stock USD.000015.96%

Weight gaps

All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ARWG and LRGC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ARWGMore in LRGC
Amphenol CorpAPHARWG +1.35 points
Micron Technology IncMUARWG +1.28 points
Cisco Systems IncCSCOARWG +0.87 points
Texas Instruments IncTXNARWG +0.52 points
UnitedHealth Group IncUNHARWG +0.38 points

All ARWG holdings⁠All 70 LRGC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARWG vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying ARWG vs LRGC

$8,301

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARWG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARWG 0.85%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ARWG $16,199LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearARWGLRGCOverpaying
10$1,508$705$803
20$5,706$2,725$2,981
30$16,199$7,898$8,301

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%ARWG
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

ARWG 82nd cheapest of 90 funds

ARWG vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ARWG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Payout (12M)
ARWG No data
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
ARWG $0.00067
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
ARWG Sep 23, 2026
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
ARWG Sep 24, 2026
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
ARWG Twice a year
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ARWGTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll ARWG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 25, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.00067. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ARWG vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARWG No dataLRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARWG No dataLRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARWG No dataLRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARWG 0.82LRGC 1.00

ARWG and LRGC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ARWGDvsJUSAA

    Archer Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARWGDvsGUSEA

    Archer Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARWGDvsFELGA

    Archer Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.