Skip to content

BGGG vs FFND

Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF

BGGGCNasdaq

One Global ETF

FFNDCNYSE Arca

Overlap

7.8%by weight

Expense ratio

BGGG −0.28pt a year

BGGG0.70%FFND0.98%

Avg volume · 30D

BGGG 4.9×the volume

BGGG42.5KFFND8.76K

BGGG vs FFND Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−9.3%BGGG−3.0%FFND

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BGGG −9.3%. FFND −3.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%−5%0%2.5%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BGGG 0.70%, better
FFND 0.98%
Fund size
BGGG $258M
FFND $94M
1Y total return
BGGG No data
FFND +4.8%
Yield (12M)
BGGG No data
FFND 0.62%
Holdings
BGGG 38
FFND 83
Avg volume (30D)
BGGG 42.5K sh, better
FFND 8.76K sh
NAV per share
BGGG $32.76
FFND $31.49
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BGGG: Cost 68, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings 38, Durability 42. FFND: Cost 7, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 74, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for BGGG, FFND, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBGGGFFND
Cost30% weightB68HigherF7
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF19B56Higher
Tradability15% weightB57B67Higher
Holdings10% weightD38A74Higher
Durability5% weightC42C52Higher

Rank among Global Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BGGG and FFND are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Growth⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

BGGG ranks 4th and FFND 6th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETFScore 72
  2. Rank 2BWLTGWealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CTAOZThornburg American Opportunities FundScore 53
  4. Rank 4CBGGGBaillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 5CTMFGMotley Fool Global Opportunities ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 6CFFNDOne Global ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 7FRWRainwater Equity ETFScore 22
  8. GAIQNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BGGGCBaillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF

FFNDCOne Global ETF

In short

BGGG Baillie Gifford's flagship concentrated global growth strategy in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 businesses picked by bottom-up research, index weights ignored. The firm's long-running mutual fund version was reorganized into this ETF in 2026.

FFND An active global stock picker with a lever most equity ETFs lack: short positions, used to hedge or pursue returns in falling markets. Roughly 90 holdings, a 0.98% expense ratio, and a 2025 overhaul that renamed it and widened the map.

Stated mandate

BGGG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by actively managing a global portfolio of common stocks and other equity securities. Its managers use bottom-up company research to select businesses with attractive long-term growth prospects without regard to index geographic, industry, sector, or issuer weights.

FFND The Fund seeks capital appreciation through active investing. Its strategy may include short positions in equity securities for hedging or to pursue returns in declining markets.

Why people hold it

  • BGGG At 0.70% a year it comes in under the typical fee in its global-growth cohort, and below active peers like WLTG (0.75%) and TMFG (0.85%).
  • About 40 holdings chosen by company research, with no deference to index country, sector or issuer weights. This is built to look nothing like a global tracker.
  • Not a startup idea: the Long Term Global Growth mutual fund was reorganized into this ETF effective June 1, 2026, bringing the same unconstrained global equity approach.bailliegifford.com
  • FFND Its prospectus allows short positions in equities, for hedging or to capture returns in down markets. That is a tool most long-only global growth funds simply do not carry.futurefundetf.com
  • A compact, high-conviction book of roughly 90 stocks, so individual picks carry real weight instead of being diluted across hundreds of names.
  • The 2025 rework was substantive, not cosmetic: new name, broadened strategy, a new primary benchmark, and a lowered advisory fee with breakpoints that step down as assets grow.sec.govsec.gov 2

Worth knowing

  • BGGG Concentration cuts both ways: with about 40 names and no index anchor, a handful of positions can drive the outcome.
  • Cheaper competition sits in the same lane: CGGO charges 0.47% and RGLO 0.59%.
  • The ETF wrapper dates to 2026, a shorter trading record than longer-running rivals, and the mandate aims at capital appreciation rather than income.
  • FFND At 0.98%, the expense ratio sits above the category median for global growth funds, where cheaper active options exist (CGGO charges 0.47%).
  • Thinly traded. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than on heavily traded funds, so the mechanics of getting in and out matter more here.
  • Shorting cuts both ways: the prospectus notes a short position loses value when the shorted stock's price rises, which can offset gains on the long side.futurefundetf.com

Full BGGG profile⁠

Full FFND profile⁠

BGGG vs FFND Holdings

How BGGG and FFND differ

Overlap by weight

7.8%

Shared holdings make up 17.8% of BGGG and 7.8% of FFND.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both7.8%
  • Countryby domicile63.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for BGGG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BGGG and FFND, widest gap first
CountryMore in BGGGMore in FFND
United StatesFFND +20.4 points
NetherlandsBGGG +9.0 points
United KingdomFFND +8.6 points
ChinaBGGG +7.7 points
TaiwanBGGG +5.9 points
BrazilBGGG +4.0 points
IndiaBGGG +3.5 points
JapanFFND +3.0 points
Other countries (7)BGGG +1.8 points

Outside the US: BGGG 42% developed, 58% emerging. FFND 72% developed, 28% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BGGG53.4%
  • FFND31.5%

Securities held

  • BGGG37
  • FFND82

Asset class

BGGG
Equity
FFND
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BGGG34
  • In both3
  • Only in FFND79

Only in BGGG

34 securities, 82.2% of BGGG by weight

  • Asml Holding NV Eur 0.097.91%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manuf Twd 10.07.34%
  • Cloudflare Inc USD 0.0016.22%

Only in FFND

79 securities, 85.8% of FFND by weight

  • Apple Inc4.95%
  • Microsoft Corp2.94%
  • Alphabet Inc-A2.36%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BGGG and FFND, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BGGGMore in FFND
NVIDIA Corp USD 0.001NVDABGGG +4.95 points
Amazon Com Inc USD 0.01AMZNBGGG +3.53 points
Axon Enterprise Inc USD 0.00001AXONBGGG +1.49 points

All 37 BGGG holdings⁠All 91 FFND holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGGG vs FFND Cost

Overpaying FFND vs BGGG

$4,756

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BGGG 0.70%

    $13,606

  • FFND 0.98%

    $18,362

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BGGG 0.70%
  • FFND 0.98%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FFND $18,362BGGG $13,606

Year by year

YearBGGGFFNDOverpaying
10$1,250$1,729$479
20$4,760$6,504$1,744
30$13,606$18,362$4,756

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%BGGG, cheaper
  • 0.98%FFND
  • Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.79%

BGGG 2nd cheapest of 8 funds

FFND 8th cheapest of 8 funds

BGGG vs FFND Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BGGG No data
FFND 0.62%
Payout (12M)
BGGG None
FFND $0.20
Last payment
BGGG No data
FFND $0.20
Ex-dividend
BGGG No data
FFND Dec 26, 2025
Paid on
BGGG No data
FFND Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
BGGG No data
FFND Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

BGGGAll BGGG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FFNDIrregular · 2 paymentsAll FFND payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2021 $0.0083; Dec 26, 2025 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

BGGG vs FFND Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BGGG No dataFFND 14.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BGGG No dataFFND 1.17
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BGGG No dataFFND −47.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BGGG 1.34FFND 1.10

Popular comparisons

  • BGGGCvsCGGOA

    Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF · Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFNDCvsCGGOA

    One Global ETF · Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BGGGCvsWLTGB

    Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF · WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFNDCvsWLTGB

    One Global ETF · WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BGGGCvsTAOZC

    Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF · Thornburg American Opportunities Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFNDCvsTAOZC

    One Global ETF · Thornburg American Opportunities Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.