Skip to content

BGGG vs TMFG

Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF

BGGGCNasdaq

Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF

TMFGCCboe

Overlap

10.9%by weight

Expense ratio

BGGG −0.15pt a year

BGGG0.70%TMFG0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

BGGG 4.2×the volume

BGGG42.5KTMFG10K

BGGG vs TMFG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−9.3%BGGG−3.7%TMFG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BGGG −9.3%. TMFG −3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%0%2.5%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BGGG 0.70%, better
TMFG 0.85%
Fund size
BGGG $258M
TMFG $329M
1Y total return
BGGG No data
TMFG −0.4%
Yield (12M)
BGGG No data
TMFG 0.27%
Holdings
BGGG 38
TMFG 45
Avg volume (30D)
BGGG 42.5K sh, better
TMFG 10K sh
NAV per share
BGGG $32.76
TMFG $30.24
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BGGG: Cost 68, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings 38, Durability 42. TMFG: Cost 27, Risk 48, Mission 64, Tradability 49, Holdings 53, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for BGGG, TMFG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBGGGTMFG
Cost30% weightB68HigherD27
Mission25% weightNot scoredB64
Risk15% weightF19C48Higher
Tradability15% weightB57HigherC49
Holdings10% weightD38C53Higher
Durability5% weightC42A78Higher

Rank among Global Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BGGG and TMFG are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Growth⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

BGGG ranks 4th and TMFG 5th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETFScore 72
  2. Rank 2BWLTGWealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CTAOZThornburg American Opportunities FundScore 53
  4. Rank 4CBGGGBaillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 5CTMFGMotley Fool Global Opportunities ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 6CFFNDOne Global ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BGGGCBaillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF

TMFGCMotley Fool Global Opportunities ETF

In short

BGGG Baillie Gifford's flagship concentrated global growth strategy in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 businesses picked by bottom-up research, index weights ignored. The firm's long-running mutual fund version was reorganized into this ETF in 2026.

TMFG The Motley Fool's own asset-management arm runs this one: a focused, actively managed portfolio of quality growth companies, with at least 40% of assets outside the US. It started as a 2014 mutual fund and swapped into an ETF wrapper in 2021.

Stated mandate

BGGG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by actively managing a global portfolio of common stocks and other equity securities. Its managers use bottom-up company research to select businesses with attractive long-term growth prospects without regard to index geographic, industry, sector, or issuer weights.

TMFG The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, focused portfolio of common stocks and depositary receipts, applying a quality-growth approach.

Why people hold it

  • BGGG At 0.70% a year it comes in under the typical fee in its global-growth cohort, and below active peers like WLTG (0.75%) and TMFG (0.85%).
  • About 40 holdings chosen by company research, with no deference to index country, sector or issuer weights. This is built to look nothing like a global tracker.
  • Not a startup idea: the Long Term Global Growth mutual fund was reorganized into this ETF effective June 1, 2026, bringing the same unconstrained global equity approach.bailliegifford.com
  • TMFG Global by rule, not by accident: the prospectus commits to at least 40% of assets outside the US (30% if conditions are unfavorable), spread across three or more countries.sec.gov
  • One line on the fee sheet: 0.85% all in, with other expenses listed at 0.00%. That sits at the median for its focused global-growth peers and well under FFND's 1.61%.sec.gov
  • Not a new fund in ETF clothing. It opened in 2014 as a mutual fund and converted to an ETF in 2021, so the strategy has been run through real market cycles.fooletfs.com
  • The mandate is to stay fully invested and not time the market, so you get the managers' stock picks rather than a cash pile waiting for a dip.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BGGG Concentration cuts both ways: with about 40 names and no index anchor, a handful of positions can drive the outcome.
  • Cheaper competition sits in the same lane: CGGO charges 0.47% and RGLO 0.59%.
  • The ETF wrapper dates to 2026, a shorter trading record than longer-running rivals, and the mandate aims at capital appreciation rather than income.
  • TMFG Active-manager pricing: 0.85% a year is many times a plain global index fund, and cohort peer CGGO charges 0.47%.
  • Thinly traded next to big index ETFs, so spreads can be wider and size can move the price.
  • A focused book with no market-cap limits, and the prospectus expects small and mid caps in the mix, so single names carry real weight.sec.gov

Full BGGG profile⁠

Full TMFG profile⁠

BGGG vs TMFG Holdings

How BGGG and TMFG differ

Overlap by weight

10.9%

Shared holdings make up 14.8% of BGGG and 11.8% of TMFG.

Level by level

  • Holdings4 in both10.9%
  • Countryby domicile68.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for BGGG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BGGG and TMFG, widest gap first
CountryMore in BGGGMore in TMFG
NetherlandsBGGG +9.2 points
United KingdomTMFG +7.0 points
ChinaBGGG +6.8 points
PhilippinesTMFG +6.6 points
CanadaTMFG +5.4 points
JapanTMFG +3.8 points
BrazilBGGG +3.6 points
IndiaBGGG +3.5 points
Other countries (10)TMFG +0.2 points

Outside the US: BGGG 42% developed, 58% emerging. TMFG 63% developed, 37% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BGGG53.4%
  • TMFG42.2%

Securities held

  • BGGG37
  • TMFG42

Asset class

BGGG
Equity
TMFG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BGGG33
  • In both4
  • Only in TMFG38

Only in BGGG

33 securities, 85.2% of BGGG by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp USD 0.0018.07%
  • Asml Holding NV Eur 0.097.91%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manuf Twd 10.07.34%

Only in TMFG

38 securities, 85.3% of TMFG by weight

  • International Container Terminal Services Inc6.45%
  • Mastercard Inc5.11%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.45%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BGGG and TMFG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BGGGMore in TMFG
Amazon Com Inc USD 0.01AMZNBGGG +3.06 points
Mercadolibre Inc USD 0.001MELIBGGG +0.83 points
Axon Enterprise Inc USD 0.00001AXONTMFG +0.52 points
Dexcom Inc USD 0.001DXCMTMFG +0.39 points

All 37 BGGG holdings⁠All TMFG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGGG vs TMFG Cost

Overpaying TMFG vs BGGG

$2,593

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BGGG 0.70%

    $13,606

  • TMFG 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BGGG 0.70%
  • TMFG 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TMFG $16,199BGGG $13,606

Year by year

YearBGGGTMFGOverpaying
10$1,250$1,508$258
20$4,760$5,706$946
30$13,606$16,199$2,593

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%BGGG, cheaper
  • 0.85%TMFG
  • Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.79%

BGGG 2nd cheapest of 8 funds

TMFG 6th cheapest of 8 funds

BGGG vs TMFG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BGGG No data
TMFG 0.27%
Payout (12M)
BGGG None
TMFG $0.08
Last payment
BGGG No data
TMFG $0.08
Ex-dividend
BGGG No data
TMFG Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
BGGG No data
TMFG Dec 19, 2025
Frequency
BGGG No data
TMFG Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

BGGGAll BGGG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TMFGAnnual · 4 paymentsAll TMFG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2022 $0.16; Dec 13, 2023 $1.51; Dec 17, 2024 $3.95; Dec 18, 2025 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

BGGG vs TMFG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BGGG No dataTMFG 13.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BGGG No dataTMFG 0.65
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BGGG No dataTMFG −33.7%since Dec 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BGGG 1.34TMFG 1.01

Popular comparisons

  • BGGGCvsCGGOA

    Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF · Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMFGCvsCGGOA

    Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF · Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BGGGCvsWLTGB

    Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF · WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMFGCvsWLTGB

    Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF · WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BGGGCvsTAOZC

    Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF · Thornburg American Opportunities Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMFGCvsTAOZC

    Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF · Thornburg American Opportunities Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.