Skip to content
etf.net

CHPS vs PSOX

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

CHPSANasdaq

Tema MLCC & PowerSemi ETF

PSOX—Cboe

Overlap

4.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CHPS −0.60pt a year

CHPS0.15%PSOX0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

CHPS 11.5×the volume

CHPS34.5KPSOX3.01K

CHPS vs PSOX Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−16.8%CHPS−19.6%PSOX

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CHPS −16.8%. PSOX −19.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%10%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
CHPS 0.15%, better
PSOX 0.75%
Fund size
CHPS $130M
PSOX $3M
1Y total return
CHPS +61.5%
PSOX No data
Yield (12M)
CHPS 0.41%
PSOX No data
Holdings
CHPS 54
PSOX 22
Avg volume (30D)
CHPS 34.5K sh, better
PSOX 3.01K sh
NAV per share
CHPS $75.55
PSOX $38.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —PSOXNot yet graded
CHPS: Cost 100, Risk 56, Mission 70, Tradability 49, Holdings 88, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for CHPS, PSOX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCHPSPSOX
Cost30% weightA100Not scored
Mission25% weightA70Not scored
Risk15% weightB56Not scored
Tradability15% weightC49Not scored
Holdings10% weightA88Not scored
Durability5% weightA70Not scored

Rank among Semiconductors funds

How we build Categories ›

Semiconductors⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

CHPS ranks 4th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.

  1. Rank 1ASOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2ASMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3ASOXXiShares Semiconductor ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 4ACHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETFScore 77
  5. Rank 5AXSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFScore 71
  6. PSOXNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CHPSAXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

PSOX—Tema MLCC & PowerSemi ETF

In short

CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.

PSOX No data

Stated mandate

CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.

PSOX No data

Why people hold it

  • CHPS At 0.15%, one of the cheapest doors into chips. SMH and SOXX each charge more than double.
  • Global mandate, so foreign foundries and equipment makers are in scope, not just the US-listed marquee names.
  • The ESG screen sits inside the index itself: the chip universe gets filtered before the portfolio is built.
  • Simple plumbing. Roughly 50 holdings, one published index, cash paid out quarterly.

PSOX No data

Worth knowing

  • CHPS Trades thinly next to SMH and SOXX. Spreads can be wider, and size takes more care to get filled.
  • Launched in 2023, so the record is short against chip funds that have lived through several boom-bust cycles.
  • The screen excludes some chip companies outright, so the lineup can look different from unscreened rivals.

PSOX No data

Full CHPS profile⁠

Full PSOX profile⁠

CHPS vs PSOX Holdings

How CHPS and PSOX differ

Overlap by weight

4.0%

Shared holdings make up 21.4% of PSOX and 4.0% of CHPS.

Level by level

  • Holdings4 in both4.0%
  • Countryby domicile48.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for PSOX.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CHPS and PSOX, widest gap first
CountryMore in CHPSMore in PSOX
United StatesCHPS +45.4 points
TaiwanPSOX +28.7 points
JapanPSOX +9.7 points
GermanyPSOX +6.0 points
NetherlandsCHPS +5.9 points
South KoreaPSOX +4.3 points
SingaporePSOX +1.7 points
ChinaPSOX +1.7 points
Other countries (2)CHPS +0.8 points

Outside the US: CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging. PSOX 36% developed, 64% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CHPS47.4%
  • PSOX71.5%

Securities held

  • CHPS53
  • PSOX21

Asset class

CHPS
Equity
PSOX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CHPS49
  • In both4
  • Only in PSOX17

Only in CHPS

49 securities, 96.0% of CHPS by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp5.34%
  • Texas Instruments Inc5.31%
  • Advanced Micro Dev5.20%

Only in PSOX

17 securities, 78.6% of PSOX by weight

  • Taiyo Yuden Co Ltd9.64%
  • Yageo Corp9.49%
  • Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd9.44%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CHPS and PSOX, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CHPSMore in PSOX
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co LtdPSOX +8.42 points
Monolithic Power Systems IncMPWRPSOX +3.47 points
Infineon Technologies AGPSOX +2.83 points
STMicroelectronics NV EUR 1.04 ADRSTMPSOX +2.42 points

All 54 CHPS holdings⁠All 22 PSOX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CHPS vs PSOX Cost

Overpaying PSOX vs CHPS

$11,345

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CHPS 0.15%

    $3,137

  • PSOX 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CHPS 0.15%
  • PSOX 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PSOX $14,482CHPS $3,137

Year by year

YearCHPSPSOXOverpaying
10$274$1,336$1,062
20$1,071$5,078$4,007
30$3,137$14,482$11,345

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%CHPS, cheaper
  • 0.75%PSOX
  • Middle half of Semiconductors funds
  • Median 0.60%

CHPS cheapest of 25 funds

PSOX 21st cheapest of 25 funds

CHPS vs PSOX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CHPS 0.41%
PSOX No data
Payout (12M)
CHPS $0.31
PSOX None
Last payment
CHPS $0.10
PSOX No data
Ex-dividend
CHPS Sep 18, 2026
PSOX No data
Paid on
CHPS Sep 25, 2026
PSOX No data
Frequency
CHPS Quarterly
PSOX No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CHPSQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll CHPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 15, 2023 $0.02; Dec 15, 2023 $0.08; Mar 15, 2024 $0.05; Jun 21, 2024 $0.07; Sep 20, 2024 $0.10; Dec 6, 2024 $0.22; Dec 20, 2024 $0.08; Mar 21, 2025 $0.06; Jun 20, 2025 $0.08; Sep 19, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.08; Mar 20, 2026 $0.05; Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PSOXAll PSOX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CHPS vs PSOX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CHPS 41.2%PSOX No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CHPS 1.12PSOX No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CHPS −39.4%since Jul 2023PSOX No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CHPS 2.16PSOX 0.00

CHPS and PSOX in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CHPSAvsSOXQA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSOX—vsSOXQA

    Tema MLCC & PowerSemi ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CHPSAvsSMHA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSOX—vsSMHA

    Tema MLCC & PowerSemi ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CHPSAvsSOXXA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSOX—vsSOXXA

    Tema MLCC & PowerSemi ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.