CRSH ranks 1st and TSLP 2nd of 9 funds in the Tesla (TSLA) Option Income Category.
CRSH vs TSLP
TSLP −0.05pt a year
1.05%1.00%
CRSH 1.2×the volume
14.5K12.4K
CRSH vs TSLP Performance
+6.4%−19.4%
- CRSH 1.05%
- TSLP 1.00%, better
- CRSH $12M
- TSLP $19M
- CRSH +6.4%, better
- TSLP −19.4%
- CRSH 79.46%, better
- TSLP 29.67%
- CRSH 10
- TSLP 7
- CRSH 14.5K sh, better
- TSLP 12.4K sh
- CRSH $17.06
- TSLP $16.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRSH | TSLP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A70Higher | B56 |
| Risk | B69Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | C46 | C48Higher |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B65Higher | B64 |
Rank among Tesla (TSLA) Option Income funds
Same Category. CRSH and TSLP are both graded against the same 9 Tesla (TSLA) Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRSHB
TSLPB
In short
CRSH Every other Tesla income fund in the aisle is rooting for the stock. CRSH takes the other side: it sells option spreads on Tesla while holding inverse exposure to the shares, turning a bearish stance into premium collection.
TSLP Tesla income with a longer fuse. TSLP builds its TSLA exposure with options dated roughly one month to a year out instead of resetting weekly, pays monthly, and charges 1.00% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
CRSH CRSH is actively managed to generate weekly income by writing put spreads on Tesla Inc. The strategy seeks option premiums from TSLA volatility while maintaining inverse exposure to TSLA share-price movements.
TSLP The fund seeks current income while retaining exposure to Tesla's share price, with potential investment gains limited.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRSH vs TSLP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRSH vs TSLP Cost
Overpaying CRSH vs TSLP
$807
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRSH 1.05%
$19,495
TSLP 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRSH | TSLP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,763 | $84 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $6,625 | $302 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $18,688 | $807 |
- 1.05%CRSH
- 1.00%TSLP, cheaper
- Middle half of Tesla (TSLA) Option Income funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLP 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
CRSH 5th cheapest of 9 funds
CRSH vs TSLP Dividends
- CRSH 79.46%, better
- TSLP 29.67%
- CRSH $13.55
- TSLP $4.78
- CRSH $0.16
- TSLP $0.32
- CRSH Oct 29, 2026
- TSLP Oct 7, 2026
- CRSH Oct 30, 2026
- TSLP Oct 8, 2026
- CRSH Weekly
- TSLP Monthly
Distribution history
CRSH vs TSLP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRSH 41.2%TSLP 43.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRSH −0.74TSLP 0.46
- Worst fall
- CRSH −64.0%TSLP −46.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CRSH −1.28TSLP 1.39
CRSH and TSLP in the news
Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses

Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 1.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 1.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 1.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.