Skip to content
etf.net

CTAP vs RSIT

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

RSITDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.85pt a year

CTAP0.13%RSIT0.98%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 2.3×the volume

CTAP86.8KRSIT38.3K

CTAP vs RSIT Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+3.5%CTAP−0.1%RSIT

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. CTAP +3.5%. RSIT −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
RSIT 0.98%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
RSIT $79M
Holdings
CTAP 42
RSIT 15
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
RSIT 38.3K sh
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
RSIT $20.60
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. RSIT: Cost 33, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings not scored, Durability 32.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, RSIT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPRSIT
Cost30% weightA100HigherD33
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45C47Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherD31
Holdings10% weightC42Not scored
Durability5% weightB59HigherD32

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and RSIT are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Capital-Efficient Allocation⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and RSIT 16th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 14DRSBYReturn Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETFScore 36
  5. Rank 16DRSITReturn Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETFScore 35
  6. Rank 16DRSSXReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

RSITDReturn Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

RSIT No data

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

RSIT No data

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.

RSIT No data

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us

RSIT No data

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full RSIT profile⁠

CTAP vs RSIT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs RSIT Cost

Overpaying RSIT vs CTAP

$15,636

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • RSIT 0.98%

    $18,362

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • RSIT 0.98%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RSIT $18,362CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPRSITOverpaying
10$238$1,729$1,491
20$930$6,504$5,574
30$2,726$18,362$15,636

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.98%RSIT
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

RSIT 13th cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs RSIT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
RSIT None
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
RSIT No data
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
RSIT No data
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
RSIT No data
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
RSIT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments in 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
RSITAll RSIT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTAP vs RSIT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34RSIT 1.78

CTAP and RSIT in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RSITDvsNTSXA

    Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RSITDvsGDEB

    Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RSITDvsNTSIB

    Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.