Skip to content

CTAP vs RSST

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

RSSTCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.86pt a year

CTAP0.13%RSST0.99%

Avg volume · 30D

RSST 1.5×the volume

CTAP86.8KRSST129K

CTAP vs RSST Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+21.5%CTAP+19.5%RSST

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAP +21.5%. RSST +19.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%25%30%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
RSST 0.99%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
RSST $585M
1Y total return
CTAP No data
RSST +22.7%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RSST 0.94%
Holdings
CTAP 42
RSST 15
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh
RSST 129K sh, better
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
RSST $34.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. RSST: Cost 28, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings not scored, Durability 71.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, RSST, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPRSST
Cost30% weightA100HigherD28
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45HigherD35
Tradability15% weightB67B67
Holdings10% weightC42Not scored
Durability5% weightB59A71Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and RSST are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and RSST 12th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 10CUPARUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 12CRSSTReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 13DARPPMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

RSSTCReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

RSST Return stacking, literally: RSST rides an actively managed futures program on top of a full U.S. equity portfolio, using leverage so one dollar does two jobs.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

RSST The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and combines U.S. equity and managed-futures strategies, using leverage to stack approximately one dollar of exposure to each strategy.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • RSST One dollar, two jobs: the U.S. equity sleeve stays fully invested while the managed futures strategy is stacked on top with leverage, not funded by selling stocks.
  • Actively managed on both sides, so the futures sleeve can shift its positioning instead of tracking a fixed index.
  • Easy to deal in for something this complicated: it sits among the smoother-trading names in its multi-asset peer group.

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • RSST At 0.99% a year it runs above the typical multi-asset allocation fund. Simpler stackers like NTSX and GDE charge 0.20%.
  • Leverage cuts both ways: a rough stretch for stocks and managed futures at the same time lands harder than either sleeve would alone.
  • Launched in 2023 and structured as a commodity pool, so the record is short and the wrapper differs from a plain-vanilla stock ETF.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full RSST profile⁠

CTAP vs RSST Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs RSST Cost

Overpaying RSST vs CTAP

$15,799

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • RSST 0.99%

    $18,525

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • RSST 0.99%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RSST $18,525CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPRSSTOverpaying
10$238$1,746$1,508
20$930$6,565$5,635
30$2,726$18,525$15,799

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.99%RSST
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

RSST 14th cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs RSST Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RSST 0.94%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
RSST $0.32
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
RSST $0.32
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
RSST Dec 29, 2025
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
RSST Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
RSST Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
RSSTAnnual · 3 paymentsAll RSST payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.19; Dec 18, 2024 $0.02; Dec 29, 2025 $0.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

CTAP vs RSST Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataRSST 17.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataRSST 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataRSST −30.8%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34RSST 1.14

CTAP and RSST in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSTCvsNTSXA

    Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSTCvsGDEB

    Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSTCvsNTSIB

    Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.