CTAP ranks 2nd and RSST 12th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
CTAP vs RSST
CTAP −0.86pt a year
0.13%0.99%
RSST 1.5×the volume
86.8K129K
CTAP vs RSST Performance
+21.5%+19.5%
- CTAP 0.13%, better
- RSST 0.99%
- CTAP $167M
- RSST $585M
- CTAP
- RSST +22.7%
- CTAP
- RSST 0.94%
- CTAP 42
- RSST 15
- CTAP 86.8K sh
- RSST 129K sh, better
- CTAP $30.26
- RSST $34.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTAP | RSST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D28 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | B67 | B67 |
| Holdings | C42 | |
| Durability | B59 | A71Higher |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. CTAP and RSST are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CTAPA
RSSTC
In short
CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.
RSST Return stacking, literally: RSST rides an actively managed futures program on top of a full U.S. equity portfolio, using leverage so one dollar does two jobs.
Stated mandate
CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.
RSST The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and combines U.S. equity and managed-futures strategies, using leverage to stack approximately one dollar of exposure to each strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTAP vs RSST Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTAP vs RSST Cost
Overpaying RSST vs CTAP
$15,799
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTAP 0.13%
$2,726
RSST 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTAP | RSST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $238 | $1,746 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $930 | $6,565 | $5,635 |
| 30 | $2,726 | $18,525 | $15,799 |
- 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
- 0.99%RSST
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
CTAP cheapest of 19 funds
RSST 14th cheapest of 19 funds
CTAP vs RSST Dividends
- CTAP
- RSST 0.94%
- CTAP
- RSST $0.32
- CTAP $0.30
- RSST $0.32
- CTAP Sep 25, 2026
- RSST Dec 29, 2025
- CTAP Sep 30, 2026
- RSST Dec 30, 2025
- CTAP Quarterly
- RSST Annual
Distribution history
CTAP vs RSST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTAP RSST 17.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTAP RSST 0.97
- Worst fall
- CTAP RSST −30.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CTAP 1.34RSST 1.14
CTAP and RSST in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.13% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




