Skip to content

CTAP vs GDE

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

GDEBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.07pt a year

CTAP0.13%GDE0.20%

Avg volume · 30D

GDE 1.4×the volume

CTAP86.8KGDE125K

CTAP vs GDE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+21.5%CTAP−3.8%GDE

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAP +21.5%. GDE −3.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
GDE 0.20%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
GDE $375M
1Y total return
CTAP No data
GDE +2.6%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
GDE 17.06%
Holdings
CTAP 42
GDE 498
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh
GDE 125K sh, better
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
GDE $51.01
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. GDE: Cost 94, Risk 27, Mission 98, Tradability 61, Holdings 68, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, GDE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPGDE
Cost30% weightA100HigherA94
Mission25% weightNot scoredA98
Risk15% weightC45HigherD27
Tradability15% weightB67HigherB61
Holdings10% weightC42B68Higher
Durability5% weightB59A78Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and GDE are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and GDE 3rd of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 4BNTSIWisdomTree International Efficient Core FundScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

GDEBWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

GDE Gold and US large caps, stacked on the same dollar. GDE holds roughly 500 US large-cap stocks and layers gold futures on top, so the metal rides along instead of crowding equities out of the portfolio.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

GDE The fund seeks total return by investing directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary in U.S.-listed gold futures contracts and U.S. large-cap equity securities.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • GDE The capital-efficiency trick: gold futures sit on top of a US large-cap stock sleeve, so making room for the metal doesn't mean selling down equities.
  • 0.20% a year, a fraction of the typical multi-asset allocation fund's fee, and priced level with WisdomTree's Treasury-stacking sibling NTSX.
  • Trades easily for a strategy this unusual, and it has been running live since 2022 rather than arriving as a fresh backtest.
  • Rare shape in the allocation aisle: most peers blend stocks and bonds, this one blends stocks and gold, and it grades near the top of that group.

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • GDE Stacking works both ways. Two exposures riding one dollar means declines can bite harder than a plain US large-cap fund, and it scores as the riskier end of its cohort.
  • Gold comes through futures held in a wholly owned subsidiary, which brings roll and collateral mechanics you don't get with a plain bullion holding.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, so this is a total-return build rather than an income stream.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full GDE profile⁠

CTAP vs GDE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs GDE Cost

Overpaying GDE vs CTAP

$1,429

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • GDE 0.20%

    $4,155

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • GDE 0.20%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K$5K051015202530GDE $4,155CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPGDEOverpaying
10$238$365$127
20$930$1,421$491
30$2,726$4,155$1,429

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.20%GDE
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

GDE 2nd cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs GDE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
GDE 17.06%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
GDE $8.73
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
GDE $8.58
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
GDE Oct 27, 2026
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
GDE Oct 29, 2026
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
GDE Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD
GDEAnnual · 9 paymentsAll GDE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Oct 25, 2022 $0.09; Dec 23, 2022 $0.08; Oct 25, 2023 $0.52; Dec 22, 2023 $0.09; Oct 28, 2024 $2.53; Dec 26, 2024 $0.12; Oct 28, 2025 $2.52; Dec 26, 2025 $0.14; Oct 27, 2026 $8.58. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD

CTAP vs GDE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataGDE 20.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataGDE 1.58
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataGDE −32.0%since Mar 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34GDE 1.00

CTAP and GDE in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDEBvsNTSXA

    WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDEBvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsALLWB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDEBvsALLWB

    WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund · State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.