TRFM ranks 3rd and DUNK 26th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
DUNK vs TRFM
TRFM −0.26pt a year
0.75%0.49%
TRFM 3.7×the volume
11.3K42.3K
DUNK vs TRFM Performance
+11.6%+8.4%
- DUNK 0.75%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- DUNK $166M
- TRFM $291M
- DUNK +11.6%, better
- TRFM +8.4%
- DUNK 26
- TRFM 266
- DUNK 11.3K sh
- TRFM 42.3K sh, better
- DUNK $27.29
- TRFM $50.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DUNK | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A81Higher |
| Mission | B55 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | D38 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | D30 | A88Higher |
| Durability | C47 | C52Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. DUNK and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DUNKD
TRFMA
In short
DUNK Most disruptive-tech funds buy the story. Dana's 2025 entry is an active portfolio that leans toward innovators already posting rising profits and business momentum, with valuation risk as a stated brake. Innovation with a profitability filter.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
DUNK The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through active investment primarily in U.S.-listed equity companies involved in, or expected to benefit from, disruptive technologies. The strategy emphasizes companies with rising profitability and business momentum while considering valuation risk.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DUNK vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DUNK vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying DUNK vs TRFM
$4,690
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DUNK 0.75%
$14,482
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DUNK | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $883 | $453 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,394 | $1,684 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,792 | $4,690 |
- 0.75%DUNK
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
DUNK 20th cheapest of 30 funds
DUNK vs TRFM Dividends
- DUNK None
- TRFM
- DUNK
- TRFM $0.08
- DUNK
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- DUNK
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- DUNK
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
DUNK vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DUNK 25.1%TRFM 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DUNK 0.34TRFM 1.03
- Worst fall
- DUNK −25.6%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DUNK 1.36TRFM 1.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.