XITK ranks 4th and DUNK 26th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
DUNK vs XITK
XITK −0.30pt a year
0.75%0.45%
DUNK 5.9×the volume
11.3K1.91K
DUNK vs XITK Performance
+11.6%+1.4%
- DUNK 0.75%
- XITK 0.45%, better
- DUNK $166M
- XITK $59M
- DUNK +11.6%, better
- XITK +1.4%
- DUNK
- XITK 0.00%
- DUNK 26
- XITK 94
- DUNK 11.3K sh, better
- XITK 1.91K sh
- DUNK $27.29
- XITK $178.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DUNK | XITK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A95Higher |
| Mission | B55 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | D38 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D30 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A73Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. DUNK and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DUNKD
XITKA
In short
DUNK Most disruptive-tech funds buy the story. Dana's 2025 entry is an active portfolio that leans toward innovators already posting rising profits and business momentum, with valuation risk as a stated brake. Innovation with a profitability filter.
XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.
Stated mandate
DUNK The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through active investment primarily in U.S.-listed equity companies involved in, or expected to benefit from, disruptive technologies. The strategy emphasizes companies with rising profitability and business momentum while considering valuation risk.
XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DUNK vs XITK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DUNK vs XITK Cost
Overpaying DUNK vs XITK
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DUNK 0.75%
$14,482
XITK 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DUNK | XITK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $812 | $524 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,128 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,041 | $5,441 |
- 0.75%DUNK
- 0.45%XITK, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
DUNK 20th cheapest of 30 funds
DUNK vs XITK Dividends
- DUNK
- XITK 0.00%
- DUNK None
- XITK None
Distribution history
DUNK vs XITK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DUNK 25.1%XITK 25.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- DUNK 0.34XITK 0.63
- Worst fall
- DUNK −25.6%XITK −61.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DUNK 1.36XITK 1.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.