Skip to content

DUNK vs XT

Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF

DUNKDNYSE Arca

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

XTANasdaq

Overlap

26.6%by weight

Expense ratio

XT −0.29pt a year

DUNK0.75%XT0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

XT 6.1×the volume

DUNK11.3KXT68.5K

DUNK vs XT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.6%DUNK+21.6%XT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. DUNK +11.6%. XT +21.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DUNK 0.75%
XT 0.46%, better
Fund size
DUNK $166M
XT $3.81B
1Y total return
DUNK +11.6%
XT +21.6%, better
Yield (12M)
DUNK No data
XT 6.88%
Holdings
DUNK 26
XT 216
Avg volume (30D)
DUNK 11.3K sh
XT 68.5K sh, better
NAV per share
DUNK $27.29
XT $79.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DUNK: Cost 22, Risk 58, Mission 55, Tradability 38, Holdings 30, Durability 47. XT: Cost 95, Risk 85, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 67, Durability 97.
Pillar letters and Scores for DUNK, XT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDUNKXT
Cost30% weightF22A95Higher
Mission25% weightB55Not scored
Risk15% weightB58A85Higher
Tradability15% weightD38A77Higher
Holdings10% weightD30B67Higher
Durability5% weightC47A97Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DUNK and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XT ranks 1st and DUNK 26th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 25DYNOTHorizon Digital Frontier ETFScore 36
  4. Rank 26DDUNKDana Unconstrained Equity ETFScore 35
  5. Rank 27DTMATMain Thematic Innovation ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DUNKDDana Unconstrained Equity ETF

XTAiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

In short

DUNK Most disruptive-tech funds buy the story. Dana's 2025 entry is an active portfolio that leans toward innovators already posting rising profits and business momentum, with valuation risk as a stated brake. Innovation with a profitability filter.

XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.

Stated mandate

DUNK The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through active investment primarily in U.S.-listed equity companies involved in, or expected to benefit from, disruptive technologies. The strategy emphasizes companies with rising profitability and business momentum while considering valuation risk.

XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.

Why people hold it

  • DUNK Actively run rather than index-bound: the mandate emphasizes disruptive-technology companies with rising profitability and business momentum, not just a good pitch deck.
  • Valuation risk is written into the strategy itself, an unusual guardrail in a corner of the market known for paying up for growth.
  • Sticks to U.S.-listed equities, so you get the innovation theme without a currency or foreign-market layer stacked on top.
  • XT Cheap for the theme at 0.46% a year, below the typical fee in its disruptive-innovation cohort and under peers like TRFM and FDTX.
  • Human fingerprint on the stock list: Morningstar equity analysts score companies on theme exposure instead of sorting by keywords or revenue tags.sec.govcontentstack.io
  • Global by construction (developed and emerging markets) and not fenced into the tech sector, so a drugmaker or an industrial can qualify on theme exposure.sec.gov
  • Launched in 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar iShares fund, it stands among the stronger builds in its innovation peer group.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • DUNK At 0.75% a year it runs above the typical disruptive-innovation ETF, and well above index-based rivals such as KOMP (0.20%) and XT (0.46%).
  • Launched in September 2025, so there is little live record behind the manager's stock picks, and it trades lightly, which tends to mean wider spreads.
  • Built around long-term growth of capital, not income; payouts are not part of the design.
  • XT The index has been reworked since launch (weighting scheme, theme list), and themes get an annual review, so today's tilt is not fixed forever.morningstar.comsec.gov
  • Moderately traded rather than a household name, which can mean wider spreads than the biggest tech ETFs.
  • About 200 positions dilutes any single breakout winner, and distributions land only once or twice a year.

Full DUNK profile⁠

Full XT profile⁠

DUNK vs XT Holdings

How DUNK and XT differ

Overlap by weight

26.6%

Shared holdings make up 53.4% of DUNK and 28.2% of XT.

Level by level

  • Holdings11 in both26.6%
  • Countryby domicile75.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors75.3%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in DUNK and XT, widest gap first
SectorMore in DUNKMore in XTGap
Health CareXT +9.4 points
FinancialsDUNK +8.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryDUNK +7.9 points
TechnologyDUNK +7.2 points
IndustrialsXT +7.1 points
UtilitiesXT +4.5 points
CommunicationXT +2.3 points
MaterialsXT +1.4 points
EnergyDUNK +0.9 points
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DUNK and XT, widest gap first
CountryMore in DUNKMore in XTGap
United StatesDUNK +18.3 points
CanadaDUNK +6.7 points
United KingdomXT +4.1 points
SwitzerlandXT +3.3 points
ChinaXT +3.1 points
JapanXT +2.8 points
GermanyXT +2.5 points
TaiwanXT +2.0 points
Other countries (5)XT +7.2 points

Outside the US: XT 75% developed, 25% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DUNK67.6%
  • XT36.0%

Securities held

  • DUNK26
  • XT193

Asset class

DUNK
Stocks
XT
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in DUNK15
  • In both11
  • Only in XT182

Only in DUNK

15 securities, 46.6% of DUNK by weight

  • Shopify Inc6.77%
  • Visa Inc6.75%
  • Mastercard Inc6.01%

Only in XT

182 securities, 71.4% of XT by weight

  • Texas Instrument4.35%
  • Tesla Inc4.16%
  • Palo Alto Networks3.05%

Weight gaps

All 11 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in DUNK and XT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in DUNKMore in XTGap
Snowflake IncSNOWDUNK +10.08 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTDUNK +5.56 points
AbbVie IncABBVDUNK +3.69 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDADUNK +1.97 points
Analog Devices IncADIXT +1.62 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNDUNK +1.61 points
Johnson & JohnsonJNJDUNK +1.49 points
Eli Lilly & CoLLYDUNK +1.33 points

All DUNK holdings⁠All 193 XT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DUNK vs XT Cost

Overpaying DUNK vs XT

$5,252

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DUNK 0.75%

    $14,482

  • XT 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DUNK 0.75%
  • XT 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DUNK $14,482XT $9,230

Year by year

YearDUNKXTOverpaying
10$1,336$830$506
20$5,078$3,195$1,883
30$14,482$9,230$5,252

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%DUNK
  • 0.46%XT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds

DUNK 20th cheapest of 30 funds

DUNK vs XT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
DUNK No data
XT 6.88%
Payout (12M)
DUNK None
XT $5.69
Last payment
DUNK No data
XT $0.36
Ex-dividend
DUNK No data
XT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
DUNK No data
XT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
DUNK No data
XT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

DUNKAll DUNK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTTwice a year · 23 paymentsAll XT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.24; Dec 21, 2017 $0.10; Dec 28, 2017 $0.0072; Jun 19, 2018 $0.29; Dec 18, 2018 $0.18; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.30; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.19; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Jun 10, 2021 $0.27; Dec 13, 2021 $0.28; Jun 9, 2022 $0.22; Dec 13, 2022 $0.15; Jun 7, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.16; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Dec 30, 2024 $0.0094; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $5.33; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

DUNK vs XT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DUNK 25.1%since Oct 2025XT 16.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DUNK 0.34since Oct 2025XT 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DUNK −25.6%since Sep 2025XT −34.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DUNK 1.36XT 1.35

DUNK and XT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DUNKDvsKOMPA

    Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsKOMPA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DUNKDvsTRFMA

    Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsTRFMA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DUNKDvsXITKA

    Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsXITKA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.