FDIS ranks 2nd and ITB 12th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
FDIS vs ITB
FDIS −0.29pt a year
0.08%0.37%
ITB 20.6×the volume
109K2.25M
ITB +0.9pt
+13.6%+14.5%
FDIS vs ITB Performance
+19.1%+35.4%
- FDIS 0.08%, better
- ITB 0.37%
- FDIS $1.63B
- ITB $2.37B
- FDIS −1.7%, better
- ITB −6.4%
- FDIS 0.77%
- ITB 1.36%, better
- FDIS 242
- ITB 44
- FDIS 109K sh
- ITB 2.25M sh, better
- FDIS $100.14
- ITB $92.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDIS | ITB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | D29 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | B60 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C51Higher | D30 |
| Durability | B58 | A81Higher |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. FDIS and ITB are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDISB
ITBD
In short
FDIS Cheap and wide. FDIS holds about 300 US consumer discretionary stocks rather than the sector's mega-cap handful, and charges 0.08% while the typical fund in its peer group asks roughly four times that.
ITB Launched in 2006, right at the top of the housing boom, ITB is the long-running pure play on American homebuilding: roughly 40 US stocks tracking one home construction index, with no global detours.
Stated mandate
FDIS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index.
ITB Seeks to track an index of U.S. equities focused on the home construction sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDIS vs ITB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDIS vs ITB Cost
Overpaying ITB vs FDIS
$5,740
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDIS 0.084%
$1,773
ITB 0.37%
$7,513
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDIS | ITB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $670 | $516 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,590 | $1,987 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $7,513 | $5,740 |
- 0.08%FDIS, cheaper
- 0.37%ITB
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
FDIS 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
ITB 9th cheapest of 14 funds
FDIS vs ITB Dividends
- FDIS 0.77%
- ITB 1.36%, better
- FDIS $0.78
- ITB $1.26
- FDIS $0.20
- ITB $0.75
- FDIS Sep 18, 2026
- ITB Sep 15, 2026
- FDIS Sep 22, 2026
- ITB Sep 18, 2026
- FDIS Quarterly
- ITB Quarterly
Distribution history
FDIS vs ITB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDIS
- ITB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDIS 18.2%, betterITB 30.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDIS 0.65, betterITB 0.29
- Worst fall
- FDIS −39.2%, betterITB −40.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FDIS 1.26ITB 1.48
FDIS and ITB in the news




Closing Bell
Stocks higher on narrow tech and consumer rally


Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.