XRT ranks 3rd and ITB 12th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
ITB vs XRT
XRT −0.02pt a year
0.37%0.35%
XRT 1.7×the volume
2.25M3.83M
ITB +5.2pt
+14.5%+9.3%
ITB vs XRT Performance
+35.4%+1.8%
- ITB 0.37%
- XRT 0.35%, better
- ITB $2.37B
- XRT $405M
- ITB −6.4%
- XRT +10.5%, better
- ITB 1.36%, better
- XRT 0.84%
- ITB 44
- XRT 76
- ITB 2.25M sh
- XRT 3.83M sh, better
- ITB $92.72
- XRT $88.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ITB | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | C50Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | F17 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | D30 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | B59 |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. ITB and XRT are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ITBD
XRTB
In short
ITB Launched in 2006, right at the top of the housing boom, ITB is the long-running pure play on American homebuilding: roughly 40 US stocks tracking one home construction index, with no global detours.
XRT Pure retail, not broad consumer discretionary. XRT equal-weights roughly 80 store chains and online sellers, so a small-cap mall retailer carries about as much freight as a mega-cap giant. It has been the sector's trading vehicle since 2006.
Stated mandate
ITB Seeks to track an index of U.S. equities focused on the home construction sector.
XRT The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ITB vs XRT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ITB vs XRT Cost
Overpaying ITB vs XRT
$387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ITB 0.37%
$7,513
XRT 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ITB | XRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $634 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,454 | $136 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $7,126 | $387 |
- 0.37%ITB
- 0.35%XRT, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XRT 6th cheapest of 14 funds
ITB 9th cheapest of 14 funds
ITB vs XRT Dividends
- ITB 1.36%, better
- XRT 0.84%
- ITB $1.26
- XRT $0.74
- ITB $0.75
- XRT $0.17
- ITB Sep 15, 2026
- XRT Sep 21, 2026
- ITB Sep 18, 2026
- XRT Sep 23, 2026
- ITB Quarterly
- XRT Quarterly
Distribution history
ITB vs XRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ITB
- XRT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ITB 30.7%XRT 20.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ITB 0.29XRT 0.61, better
- Worst fall
- ITB −40.5%, betterXRT −44.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ITB 1.48XRT 1.17
ITB and XRT in the news



Closing Bell
Stocks higher on narrow tech and consumer rally



Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.