FELG ranks 4th and FFLG 12th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs FFLG
FELG −0.20pt a year
0.18%0.38%
FELG 3.9×the volume
379K98.4K
FELG vs FFLG Performance
−0.5%+2.2%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- FFLG 0.38%
- FELG $5.78B
- FFLG $635M
- FELG −0.5%
- FFLG +2.2%, better
- FELG 0.37%, better
- FFLG 0.07%
- FELG 133
- FFLG 101
- FELG 379K sh, better
- FFLG 98.4K sh
- FELG $42.20
- FFLG $31.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | FFLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A88 |
| Mission | A82Higher | A73 |
| Risk | C51Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A95Higher | A81 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and FFLG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
FFLGB
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
FFLG Fidelity hands its portfolio managers' highest-conviction large-cap growth ideas to a quantitative construction process, which builds them into a roughly 100-stock portfolio. Human picks, machine sizing, at a below-median fee.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
FFLG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a diversified domestic large-cap growth equity strategy. Its process combines Fidelity portfolio managers’ fundamental research and high-conviction ideas with quantitative portfolio construction.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs FFLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs FFLG Cost
Overpaying FFLG vs FELG
$3,957
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
FFLG 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | FFLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $688 | $360 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,658 | $1,377 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $7,706 | $3,957 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.38%FFLG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
FFLG 10th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs FFLG Dividends
- FELG 0.37%, better
- FFLG 0.07%
- FELG $0.16
- FFLG $0.02
- FELG $0.04
- FFLG $0.01
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- FFLG Sep 18, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- FFLG Sep 22, 2026
- FELG Quarterly
- FFLG Quarterly
Distribution history
FELG vs FFLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%FFLG 20.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93FFLG 1.03
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%FFLG −44.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23FFLG 1.34
FELG and FFLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

