LRGC ranks 3rd and FFLG 12th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FFLG vs LRGC
FFLG −0.01pt a year
0.38%0.39%
FFLG 2.9×the volume
98.4K34.1K
FFLG +4.2pt
+25.7%+21.5%
FFLG vs LRGC Performance
+2.2%+9.5%
- FFLG 0.38%, better
- LRGC 0.39%
- FFLG $635M
- LRGC $1.37B
- FFLG +2.2%
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- FFLG 0.07%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FFLG 101
- LRGC 72
- FFLG 98.4K sh, better
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- FFLG $31.16
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFLG | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A73 | A79Higher |
| Risk | C41 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A78 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FFLG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFLGB
LRGCA
In short
FFLG Fidelity hands its portfolio managers' highest-conviction large-cap growth ideas to a quantitative construction process, which builds them into a roughly 100-stock portfolio. Human picks, machine sizing, at a below-median fee.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
FFLG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a diversified domestic large-cap growth equity strategy. Its process combines Fidelity portfolio managers’ fundamental research and high-conviction ideas with quantitative portfolio construction.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFLG vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFLG vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying LRGC vs FFLG
$192
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFLG 0.38%
$7,706
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFLG | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $705 | $17 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $2,725 | $67 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $7,898 | $192 |
- 0.38%FFLG, cheaper
- 0.39%LRGC
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FFLG 10th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
FFLG vs LRGC Dividends
- FFLG 0.07%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- FFLG $0.02
- LRGC $0.45
- FFLG $0.01
- LRGC $0.45
- FFLG Sep 18, 2026
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- FFLG Sep 22, 2026
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- FFLG Quarterly
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
FFLG vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFLG 20.1%LRGC 12.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FFLG 1.03LRGC 1.26, better
- Worst fall
- FFLG −44.5%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FFLG 1.34LRGC 1.00
FFLG and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

