GUSE ranks 2nd and FFLG 12th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FFLG vs GUSE
GUSE −0.08pt a year
0.38%0.30%
FFLG 3.9×the volume
98.4K24.9K
FFLG vs GUSE Performance
+4.0%+11.8%
- FFLG 0.38%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- FFLG $635M
- GUSE $421M
- FFLG +2.2%
- GUSE
- FFLG 0.07%
- GUSE
- FFLG 101
- GUSE 122
- FFLG 98.4K sh, better
- GUSE 24.9K sh
- FFLG $31.16
- GUSE $46.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFLG | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A73 | |
| Risk | C41 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | C46 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FFLG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFLGB
GUSEA
In short
FFLG Fidelity hands its portfolio managers' highest-conviction large-cap growth ideas to a quantitative construction process, which builds them into a roughly 100-stock portfolio. Human picks, machine sizing, at a below-median fee.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
FFLG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a diversified domestic large-cap growth equity strategy. Its process combines Fidelity portfolio managers’ fundamental research and high-conviction ideas with quantitative portfolio construction.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFLG vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFLG vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying FFLG vs GUSE
$1,557
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFLG 0.38%
$7,706
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFLG | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $545 | $143 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $2,113 | $545 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $6,149 | $1,557 |
- 0.38%FFLG
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
FFLG 10th cheapest of 90 funds
FFLG vs GUSE Dividends
- FFLG 0.07%
- GUSE
- FFLG $0.02
- GUSE
- FFLG $0.01
- GUSE $0.30
- FFLG Sep 18, 2026
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- FFLG Sep 22, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- FFLG Quarterly
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
FFLG vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFLG 20.1%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- FFLG 1.03GUSE
- Worst fall
- FFLG −44.5%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- FFLG 1.34GUSE 0.93
FFLG and GUSE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
