JUSA ranks 1st and FFLG 12th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FFLG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.20pt a year
0.38%0.18%
JUSA 1.00×the volume
98.4K98.8K
FFLG vs JUSA Performance
+2.2%+10.8%
- FFLG 0.38%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- FFLG $635M
- JUSA $745M
- FFLG +2.2%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- FFLG 0.07%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FFLG 101
- JUSA 263
- FFLG 98.4K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- FFLG $31.16
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFLG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A84Higher |
| Risk | C41 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | C46 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A76 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FFLG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFLGB
JUSAA
In short
FFLG Fidelity hands its portfolio managers' highest-conviction large-cap growth ideas to a quantitative construction process, which builds them into a roughly 100-stock portfolio. Human picks, machine sizing, at a below-median fee.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FFLG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a diversified domestic large-cap growth equity strategy. Its process combines Fidelity portfolio managers’ fundamental research and high-conviction ideas with quantitative portfolio construction.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFLG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFLG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying FFLG vs JUSA
$3,957
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFLG 0.38%
$7,706
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFLG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $328 | $360 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $1,281 | $1,377 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $3,749 | $3,957 |
- 0.38%FFLG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
FFLG 10th cheapest of 90 funds
FFLG vs JUSA Dividends
- FFLG 0.07%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- FFLG $0.02
- JUSA $0.49
- FFLG $0.01
- JUSA $0.13
- FFLG Sep 18, 2026
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- FFLG Sep 22, 2026
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- FFLG Quarterly
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
FFLG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFLG 20.1%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FFLG 1.03JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- FFLG −44.5%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FFLG 1.34JUSA 0.98
FFLG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


