FELG ranks 4th and LCLG 70th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs LCLG
FELG −0.67pt a year
0.18%0.85%
FELG 490.3×the volume
379K773
FELG vs LCLG Performance
−1.7%+4.8%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- LCLG 0.85%
- FELG $5.78B
- LCLG $102M
- FELG −1.7%
- LCLG +4.8%, better
- FELG 0.37%, better
- LCLG 0.00%
- FELG 132
- LCLG 55
- FELG 379K sh, better
- LCLG 773 sh
- FELG $42.20
- LCLG $66.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | LCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | C52 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | B59 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and LCLG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
LCLGD
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
LCLG A Philadelphia-area stock shop's flagship growth list in ETF form: an unbenchmarked, hand-picked large-cap growth portfolio at 0.85%, converted from a mutual fund in 2022 and renamed back to Large Cap Growth in 2026.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
LCLG Seek long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in large-capitalization U.S. equity companies whose innovative or cutting-edge technologies or ideas may create competitive advantages and support durable earnings growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs LCLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs LCLG Cost
Overpaying LCLG vs FELG
$12,450
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
LCLG 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | LCLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,508 | $1,180 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,706 | $4,425 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $16,199 | $12,450 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.85%LCLG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
LCLG 82nd cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs LCLG Dividends
- FELG 0.37%, better
- LCLG 0.00%
- FELG $0.16
- LCLG None
- FELG $0.04
- LCLG
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- LCLG
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- LCLG
- FELG Quarterly
- LCLG
Distribution history
FELG vs LCLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%LCLG 19.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93LCLG 1.06
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%LCLG −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23LCLG 1.37
FELG and LCLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
