JUSA ranks 1st and LCLG 70th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs LCLG
JUSA −0.67pt a year
0.18%0.85%
JUSA 127.8×the volume
98.8K773
JUSA vs LCLG Performance
+10.3%+4.8%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- LCLG 0.85%
- JUSA $745M
- LCLG $102M
- JUSA +10.3%, better
- LCLG +4.8%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LCLG 0.00%
- JUSA 265
- LCLG 55
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- LCLG 773 sh
- JUSA $67.75
- LCLG $66.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | LCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | A78 |
| Durability | A76Higher | B59 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and LCLG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
LCLGD
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
LCLG A Philadelphia-area stock shop's flagship growth list in ETF form: an unbenchmarked, hand-picked large-cap growth portfolio at 0.85%, converted from a mutual fund in 2022 and renamed back to Large Cap Growth in 2026.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
LCLG Seek long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in large-capitalization U.S. equity companies whose innovative or cutting-edge technologies or ideas may create competitive advantages and support durable earnings growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs LCLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs LCLG Cost
Overpaying LCLG vs JUSA
$12,450
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
LCLG 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | LCLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,508 | $1,180 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,706 | $4,425 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $16,199 | $12,450 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.85%LCLG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
LCLG 82nd cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs LCLG Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LCLG 0.00%
- JUSA $0.49
- LCLG None
- JUSA $0.13
- LCLG
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- LCLG
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- LCLG
- JUSA Quarterly
- LCLG
Distribution history
JUSA vs LCLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%LCLG 19.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41LCLG 1.06
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%LCLG −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98LCLG 1.37
JUSA and LCLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

