Skip to content

LCLG vs LRGC

Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF

LCLGDNYSE Arca

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

21.4%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.46pt a year

LCLG0.85%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 44.1×the volume

LCLG773LRGC34.1K

3Y return · a year

LCLG +4.7pt

LCLG+25.1%LRGC+20.4%

LCLG vs LRGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+4.8%LCLG+9.2%LRGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. LCLG +4.8%. LRGC +9.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LCLG 0.85%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
LCLG $102M
LRGC $1.35B
1Y total return
LCLG +4.8%
LRGC +9.2%, better
Yield (12M)
LCLG 0.00%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Holdings
LCLG 55
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
LCLG 773 sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
LCLG $66.92
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LCLG: Cost 7, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 78, Durability 59. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for LCLG, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLCLGLRGC
Cost30% weightF7A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightB57A90Higher
Tradability15% weightC47A75Higher
Holdings10% weightA78HigherA77
Durability5% weightB59A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LCLG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and LCLG 70th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 69DAMGRAmana Growth ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 70DLCLGLogan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 70DTFGZThornburg Focus Growth FundScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LCLGDLogan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

LCLG A Philadelphia-area stock shop's flagship growth list in ETF form: an unbenchmarked, hand-picked large-cap growth portfolio at 0.85%, converted from a mutual fund in 2022 and renamed back to Large Cap Growth in 2026.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

LCLG Seek long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in large-capitalization U.S. equity companies whose innovative or cutting-edge technologies or ideas may create competitive advantages and support durable earnings growth.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • LCLG Actively run with no index to hug: holdings come from a three-part screen (top-down macro, fundamental research, technical confirmation), not a rules file.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The record predates the wrapper. LCLG is the accounting and performance survivor of a 2012-vintage Logan mutual fund that became an ETF in August 2022.sec.gov
  • Not a side project: Logan Capital has been running this large-cap growth strategy since 1997, and the founding principals co-manage the growth portfolios.logancapital.comlogancapital.com 2
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • LCLG At 0.85%, the fee sits above the category median and well above enhanced-index peers like JUSA and FELG at 0.18%. Stock picking carries that cost.
  • Thinly traded and small by ETF standards, so spreads can be wider; limit orders matter more here than in a mega-fund.
  • US large caps are the core, but the prospectus allows up to 20% in foreign issuers, including emerging markets. The mandate is appreciation, not income.sec.gov
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full LCLG profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

LCLG vs LRGC Holdings

How LCLG and LRGC differ

Overlap by weight

21.4%

Shared holdings make up 36.1% of LCLG and 25.5% of LRGC.

Level by level

  • Holdings11 in both21.4%
  • Sector11 Sectors80.4%
  • Countryby domicile95.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in LCLG and LRGC, widest gap first
SectorMore in LCLGMore in LRGC
Consumer DiscretionaryLCLG +7.5 points
IndustrialsLCLG +6.8 points
Health CareLRGC +6.5 points
FinancialsLRGC +5.3 points
CommunicationLCLG +3.7 points
EnergyLRGC +3.1 points
UtilitiesLRGC +1.7 points
Consumer StaplesLRGC +1.6 points
TechnologyLCLG +1.5 points
Real EstateLRGC +1.3 points
MaterialsLRGC +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LCLG and LRGC, widest gap first
CountryMore in LCLGMore in LRGC
MexicoLCLG +3.6 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.2 points
NetherlandsLRGC +1.2 points
United StatesLRGC +1.1 points
United KingdomLRGC +0.8 points
SwitzerlandLCLG +0.7 points
CanadaLCLG +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LCLG43.2%
  • LRGC42.4%

Securities held

  • LCLG55
  • LRGC71

Asset class

LCLG
Equity
LRGC
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LCLG44
  • In both11
  • Only in LRGC60

Only in LCLG

44 securities, 63.9% of LCLG by weight

  • Mastercard Inc4.48%
  • Kla Corp3.87%
  • Fastenal Co3.43%

Only in LRGC

60 securities, 74.3% of LRGC by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0017.49%
  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006256.93%
  • Visa Inc Class A Shares Common Stock USD.00013.38%

Weight gaps

All 11 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in LCLG and LRGC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in LCLGMore in LRGC
Amphenol CorpAPHLCLG +5.06 points
Micron Technology IncMULCLG +4.14 points
Alphabet IncGOOGLRGC +2.89 points
United Rentals IncURILCLG +2.29 points
Broadcom IncAVGOLCLG +1.69 points
Meta Platforms IncMETALCLG +0.85 points
Waters CorpWATLCLG +0.64 points
Apple IncAAPLLRGC +0.60 points

All LCLG holdings⁠All 70 LRGC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LCLG vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying LCLG vs LRGC

$8,301

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LCLG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LCLG 0.85%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LCLG $16,199LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLCLGLRGCOverpaying
10$1,508$705$803
20$5,706$2,725$2,981
30$16,199$7,898$8,301

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%LCLG
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

LCLG 82nd cheapest of 90 funds

LCLG vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
LCLG 0.00%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Payout (12M)
LCLG None
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
LCLG No data
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
LCLG No data
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
LCLG No data
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
LCLG No data
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

LCLG3 paymentsAll LCLG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.61; Dec 27, 2023 $0.39; Dec 30, 2024 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

LCLG vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LCLG 19.5%LRGC 12.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LCLG 1.06LRGC 1.26, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LCLG −25.8%since Aug 2022LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LCLG 1.37LRGC 1.00

LCLG and LRGC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LCLGDvsJUSAA

    Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCLGDvsGUSEA

    Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCLGDvsFELGA

    Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.