FELG ranks 4th and LSGR 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs LSGR
FELG −0.41pt a year
0.18%0.59%
FELG 6.6×the volume
379K57.5K
FELG vs LSGR Performance
−0.5%−3.8%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- LSGR 0.59%
- FELG $5.78B
- LSGR $848M
- FELG −0.5%, better
- LSGR −3.8%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- LSGR 0.00%
- FELG 133
- LSGR 22
- FELG 379K sh, better
- LSGR 57.5K sh
- FELG $42.20
- LSGR $43.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | LSGR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | D26 |
| Durability | A95Higher | B63 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and LSGR are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
LSGRC
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
LSGR Twenty-odd stocks, one veteran manager, and a holding period measured in years. LSGR puts Loomis Sayles' private-equity-style growth strategy in an ETF at 0.59% net of a waiver through April 30, 2029 (0.61% gross).
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
LSGR The Fund's stated aim is to achieve capital growth over the long term.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs LSGR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs LSGR Cost
Overpaying LSGR vs FELG
$7,886
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
LSGR 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | LSGR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,058 | $730 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $4,051 | $2,770 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,635 | $7,886 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.59%LSGR
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
LSGR 56th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs LSGR Dividends
- FELG 0.37%, better
- LSGR 0.00%
- FELG $0.16
- LSGR None
- FELG $0.04
- LSGR
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- LSGR
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- LSGR
- FELG Quarterly
- LSGR
Distribution history
FELG vs LSGR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%LSGR 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93LSGR 0.96
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%LSGR −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23LSGR 1.28
FELG and LSGR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
