LRGC ranks 3rd and LSGR 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs LSGR
LRGC −0.20pt a year
0.39%0.59%
LSGR 1.7×the volume
34.1K57.5K
LSGR +0.3pt
+20.4%+20.7%
LRGC vs LSGR Performance
+9.2%−3.7%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- LSGR 0.59%
- LRGC $1.35B
- LSGR $848M
- LRGC +9.2%, better
- LSGR −3.7%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- LSGR 0.00%
- LRGC 72
- LSGR 22
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- LSGR 57.5K sh, better
- LRGC $85.00
- LSGR $43.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | LSGR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A75 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A77Higher | D26 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B63 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and LSGR are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
LSGRC
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
LSGR Twenty-odd stocks, one veteran manager, and a holding period measured in years. LSGR puts Loomis Sayles' private-equity-style growth strategy in an ETF at 0.59% net of a waiver through April 30, 2029 (0.61% gross).
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
LSGR The Fund's stated aim is to achieve capital growth over the long term.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs LSGR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs LSGR Cost
Overpaying LSGR vs LRGC
$3,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
LSGR 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | LSGR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,058 | $353 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,051 | $1,326 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $11,635 | $3,737 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.59%LSGR
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
LSGR 56th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs LSGR Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- LSGR 0.00%
- LRGC $0.45
- LSGR None
- LRGC $0.45
- LSGR
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- LSGR
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- LSGR
- LRGC Annual
- LSGR
Distribution history
LRGC vs LSGR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%, betterLSGR 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26, betterLSGR 0.96
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%LSGR −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00LSGR 1.28
LRGC and LSGR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
