Skip to content

GUSE vs LSGR

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF

LSGRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.29pt a year

GUSE0.30%LSGR0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

LSGR 2.3×the volume

GUSE24.9KLSGR57.5K

GUSE vs LSGR Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+11.3%GUSE−2.1%LSGR

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. GUSE +11.3%. LSGR −2.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
LSGR 0.59%
Fund size
GUSE $413M
LSGR $848M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
LSGR −3.7%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
LSGR 0.00%
Holdings
GUSE 122
LSGR 22
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh
LSGR 57.5K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $45.25
LSGR $43.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. LSGR: Cost 38, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 26, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, LSGR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSELSGR
Cost30% weightA97HigherD38
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94HigherC43
Tradability15% weightC46A78Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherD26
Durability5% weightA85HigherB63

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and LSGR are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and LSGR 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 50CBASGBrown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 50CLSGRNatixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETFScore 46
  6. Rank 54CBEEXThe BeeHive ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

LSGRCNatixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

LSGR Twenty-odd stocks, one veteran manager, and a holding period measured in years. LSGR puts Loomis Sayles' private-equity-style growth strategy in an ETF at 0.59% net of a waiver through April 30, 2029 (0.61% gross).

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

LSGR The Fund's stated aim is to achieve capital growth over the long term.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • LSGR The prospectus targets roughly 20 to 30 stocks, so each pick carries real weight instead of being diluted across hundreds of names.sec.govloomissayles.com
  • Built to sit still: Loomis Sayles runs this as a long-horizon, low-turnover strategy under one manager, Aziz Hamzaogullari, not as benchmark-hugging growth.natixis.comloomissayles.com
  • At 0.59% net (0.61% gross, waived through April 30, 2029) the fee lands near the typical cost for active US growth funds rather than above it.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • LSGR Concentration cuts both ways: with 20 to 30 large-cap names, one stock's move can swing this fund far more than a broad growth index.sec.gov
  • Cheaper same-benchmark active growth ETFs exist, among them ACGR at 0.39% and LGDS at 0.40%; here you pay up for the focused approach.
  • No payout stream in the last year. The stated aim is capital growth over the long term, so this is a price-return story, not an income one.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full LSGR profile⁠

GUSE vs LSGR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs LSGR Cost

Overpaying LSGR vs GUSE

$5,486

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • LSGR 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • LSGR 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530LSGR $11,635GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSELSGROverpaying
10$545$1,058$513
20$2,113$4,051$1,938
30$6,149$11,635$5,486

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.59%LSGR
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

LSGR 56th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs LSGR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
LSGR 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
LSGR None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
LSGR No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
LSGR No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
LSGR No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
LSGR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
LSGR3 paymentsAll LSGR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.0085; Dec 20, 2024 $0.03; Apr 8, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GUSE vs LSGR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataLSGR 18.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataLSGR 0.96
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataLSGR −22.9%since Jun 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.94LSGR 1.28

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LSGRCvsJUSAA

    Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LSGRCvsLRGCA

    Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LSGRCvsFELGA

    Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.