GUSE ranks 2nd and LSGR 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs LSGR
GUSE −0.29pt a year
0.30%0.59%
LSGR 2.3×the volume
24.9K57.5K
GUSE vs LSGR Performance
+11.3%−2.1%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- LSGR 0.59%
- GUSE $413M
- LSGR $848M
- GUSE
- LSGR −3.7%
- GUSE
- LSGR 0.00%
- GUSE 122
- LSGR 22
- GUSE 24.9K sh
- LSGR 57.5K sh, better
- GUSE $45.25
- LSGR $43.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | LSGR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C46 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D26 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B63 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and LSGR are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
LSGRC
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
LSGR Twenty-odd stocks, one veteran manager, and a holding period measured in years. LSGR puts Loomis Sayles' private-equity-style growth strategy in an ETF at 0.59% net of a waiver through April 30, 2029 (0.61% gross).
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
LSGR The Fund's stated aim is to achieve capital growth over the long term.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs LSGR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs LSGR Cost
Overpaying LSGR vs GUSE
$5,486
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
LSGR 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | LSGR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,058 | $513 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $4,051 | $1,938 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $11,635 | $5,486 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.59%LSGR
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
LSGR 56th cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs LSGR Dividends
- GUSE
- LSGR 0.00%
- GUSE
- LSGR None
- GUSE $0.30
- LSGR
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- LSGR
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- LSGR
- GUSE Irregular
- LSGR
Distribution history
GUSE vs LSGR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSE LSGR 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSE LSGR 0.96
- Worst fall
- GUSE LSGR −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.94LSGR 1.28
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.