JUSA ranks 1st and LSGR 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs LSGR
JUSA −0.41pt a year
0.18%0.59%
JUSA 1.7×the volume
98.8K57.5K
JUSA vs LSGR Performance
+10.3%−3.7%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- LSGR 0.59%
- JUSA $745M
- LSGR $848M
- JUSA +10.3%, better
- LSGR −3.7%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LSGR 0.00%
- JUSA 265
- LSGR 22
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- LSGR 57.5K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- LSGR $43.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | LSGR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B59 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | D26 |
| Durability | A76Higher | B63 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and LSGR are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
LSGRC
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
LSGR Twenty-odd stocks, one veteran manager, and a holding period measured in years. LSGR puts Loomis Sayles' private-equity-style growth strategy in an ETF at 0.59% net of a waiver through April 30, 2029 (0.61% gross).
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
LSGR The Fund's stated aim is to achieve capital growth over the long term.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs LSGR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs LSGR Cost
Overpaying LSGR vs JUSA
$7,886
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
LSGR 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | LSGR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,058 | $730 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $4,051 | $2,770 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,635 | $7,886 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.59%LSGR
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
LSGR 56th cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs LSGR Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LSGR 0.00%
- JUSA $0.49
- LSGR None
- JUSA $0.13
- LSGR
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- LSGR
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- LSGR
- JUSA Quarterly
- LSGR
Distribution history
JUSA vs LSGR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%LSGR 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41LSGR 0.96
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%LSGR −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98LSGR 1.28
JUSA and LSGR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

