FELG ranks 4th and PCLC 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs PCLC
FELG −0.32pt a year
0.18%0.50%
FELG 758.0×the volume
379K500
FELG vs PCLC Performance
−0.6%−2.3%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- PCLC 0.50%
- FELG $5.78B
- PCLC $2M
- FELG −0.5%
- PCLC
- FELG 0.37%
- PCLC
- FELG 133
- PCLC 40
- FELG 379K sh, better
- PCLC 500 sh
- FELG $42.20
- PCLC $24.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | PCLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | C52 | B66Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | D25 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and PCLC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
PCLCC
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
PCLC Polen put its 5Perspectives framework, a 25-year-old blend of fundamental, thematic and technical analysis, into an ETF. Active large-cap growth hunting innovators at an earnings inflection, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
PCLC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of large-cap issuers exhibiting growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs PCLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs PCLC Cost
Overpaying PCLC vs FELG
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
PCLC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | PCLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $900 | $572 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,460 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $9,979 | $6,230 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.50%PCLC
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
PCLC 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs PCLC Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- PCLC
- FELG $0.16
- PCLC None
- FELG $0.04
- PCLC
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- PCLC
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- PCLC
- FELG Quarterly
- PCLC
Distribution history
FELG vs PCLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%PCLC
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93PCLC
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%PCLC
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23PCLC 2.48
FELG and PCLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
