JUSA ranks 1st and PCLC 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs PCLC
JUSA −0.32pt a year
0.18%0.50%
JUSA 197.5×the volume
98.8K500
JUSA vs PCLC Performance
+0.5%−2.3%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- PCLC 0.50%
- JUSA $745M
- PCLC $2M
- JUSA +10.8%
- PCLC
- JUSA 0.72%
- PCLC
- JUSA 263
- PCLC 40
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- PCLC 500 sh
- JUSA $67.75
- PCLC $24.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | PCLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A76Higher | D25 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and PCLC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
PCLCC
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
PCLC Polen put its 5Perspectives framework, a 25-year-old blend of fundamental, thematic and technical analysis, into an ETF. Active large-cap growth hunting innovators at an earnings inflection, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
PCLC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of large-cap issuers exhibiting growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs PCLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs PCLC Cost
Overpaying PCLC vs JUSA
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
PCLC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | PCLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $900 | $572 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,460 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $9,979 | $6,230 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.50%PCLC
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
PCLC 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs PCLC Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%
- PCLC
- JUSA $0.49
- PCLC None
- JUSA $0.13
- PCLC
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- PCLC
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- PCLC
- JUSA Quarterly
- PCLC
Distribution history
JUSA vs PCLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%PCLC
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41PCLC
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%PCLC
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98PCLC 2.48
JUSA and PCLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

