LRGC ranks 3rd and PCLC 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs PCLC
LRGC −0.11pt a year
0.39%0.50%
LRGC 68.1×the volume
34.1K500
LRGC vs PCLC Performance
−0.1%−2.3%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- PCLC 0.50%
- LRGC $1.37B
- PCLC $2M
- LRGC +9.5%
- PCLC
- LRGC 0.53%
- PCLC
- LRGC 72
- PCLC 40
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- PCLC 500 sh
- LRGC $85.00
- PCLC $24.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | PCLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A78Higher | D25 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and PCLC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
PCLCC
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
PCLC Polen put its 5Perspectives framework, a 25-year-old blend of fundamental, thematic and technical analysis, into an ETF. Active large-cap growth hunting innovators at an earnings inflection, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
PCLC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of large-cap issuers exhibiting growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs PCLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs PCLC Cost
Overpaying PCLC vs LRGC
$2,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
PCLC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | PCLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $900 | $195 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,460 | $735 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,979 | $2,081 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.50%PCLC
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
PCLC 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs PCLC Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%
- PCLC
- LRGC $0.45
- PCLC None
- LRGC $0.45
- PCLC
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- PCLC
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- PCLC
- LRGC Annual
- PCLC
Distribution history
LRGC vs PCLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%PCLC
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26PCLC
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%PCLC
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00PCLC 2.48
LRGC and PCLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
