Skip to content

LRGC vs PCLC

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF

PCLCCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.11pt a year

LRGC0.39%PCLC0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 68.1×the volume

LRGC34.1KPCLC500

LRGC vs PCLC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.1%LRGC−2.3%PCLC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. LRGC −0.1%. PCLC −2.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2.5%5%7.5%10%12.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
PCLC 0.50%
Fund size
LRGC $1.37B
PCLC $2M
1Y total return
LRGC +9.5%
PCLC No data
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
PCLC No data
Holdings
LRGC 72
PCLC 40
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
PCLC 500 sh
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
PCLC $24.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. PCLC: Cost 62, Risk 33, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 66, Durability 25.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, PCLC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCPCLC
Cost30% weightA82HigherB62
Mission25% weightA79Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherD33
Tradability15% weightA75HigherD32
Holdings10% weightA77HigherB66
Durability5% weightA78HigherD25

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and PCLC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and PCLC 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 64CHFGOHartford Large Cap Growth ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64CPCLCPolen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 64CSSMGVirtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

PCLCCPolen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

PCLC Polen put its 5Perspectives framework, a 25-year-old blend of fundamental, thematic and technical analysis, into an ETF. Active large-cap growth hunting innovators at an earnings inflection, for 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

PCLC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of large-cap issuers exhibiting growth characteristics.

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com
  • PCLC The whole pitch is the process: fundamental, thematic and technical evidence weighed across five lenses, with that combined weight of evidence setting buys, sells and position sizes.polencapital.com
  • At 0.50% a year it sits below the middle of its active large-growth peer group, though enhanced-index rivals like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) undercut it by a wide margin.
  • The mandate is concrete: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap growth equities, with the team leaning on secular themes like AI, electrification, genomics and aerospace.polencapital.cominvestmentnews.com
  • Drew Cupps has run this framework for decades, at his own firm and two others before the team joined Polen in 2025, and he manages the fund himself.polencapital.compolencapital.com 2

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.
  • PCLC Small and thinly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads and less predictable fills than the household-name large-cap ETFs in this aisle.
  • Launched in 2026. The framework's long record was built in separate accounts at prior firms, not in this ticker, so there is little fund-level history to lean on.polencapital.com
  • Income is incidental here: distributions are annual and come from net investment income, and the fund discloses that part of a payout can be return of capital.

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full PCLC profile⁠

LRGC vs PCLC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs PCLC Cost

Overpaying PCLC vs LRGC

$2,081

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • PCLC 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • PCLC 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PCLC $9,979LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCPCLCOverpaying
10$705$900$195
20$2,725$3,460$735
30$7,898$9,979$2,081

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 0.50%PCLC
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

PCLC 33rd cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs PCLC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
PCLC No data
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
PCLC None
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
PCLC No data
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
PCLC No data
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
PCLC No data
Frequency
LRGC Annual
PCLC No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
PCLCAll PCLC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGC vs PCLC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%PCLC No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26PCLC No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023PCLC No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00PCLC 2.48

LRGC and PCLC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCLCCvsJUSAA

    Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCLCCvsGUSEA

    Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCLCCvsFELGA

    Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.