GUSE ranks 2nd and PCLC 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs PCLC
GUSE −0.20pt a year
0.30%0.50%
GUSE 49.8×the volume
24.9K500
GUSE vs PCLC Performance
+0.5%−2.3%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- PCLC 0.50%
- GUSE $421M
- PCLC $2M
- GUSE 122
- PCLC 40
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- PCLC 500 sh
- GUSE $46.05
- PCLC $24.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | PCLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D25 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and PCLC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
PCLCC
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
PCLC Polen put its 5Perspectives framework, a 25-year-old blend of fundamental, thematic and technical analysis, into an ETF. Active large-cap growth hunting innovators at an earnings inflection, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
PCLC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of large-cap issuers exhibiting growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs PCLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs PCLC Cost
Overpaying PCLC vs GUSE
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
PCLC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | PCLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $900 | $355 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,460 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,979 | $3,830 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.50%PCLC
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
PCLC 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs PCLC Dividends
- GUSE
- PCLC None
- GUSE $0.30
- PCLC
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- PCLC
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- PCLC
- GUSE Irregular
- PCLC
Distribution history
GUSE vs PCLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.93PCLC 2.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.