FELG ranks 4th and WINN 32nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs WINN
FELG −0.39pt a year
0.18%0.57%
FELG 3.6×the volume
379K106K
FELG vs WINN Performance
−0.5%+1.8%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- WINN 0.57%
- FELG $5.78B
- WINN $1.19B
- FELG −0.5%
- WINN +1.8%, better
- FELG 0.37%, better
- WINN 0.00%
- FELG 133
- WINN 75
- FELG 379K sh, better
- WINN 106K sh
- FELG $42.20
- WINN $32.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | WINN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | C52 | B62Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | A79 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and WINN are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
WINNB
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
WINN Jennison Associates, the boutique behind Harbor's flagship growth franchise, picks roughly 70 US growth names here. Concentrated by design, non-diversified by the prospectus's own label, and priced like the active fund it is.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
WINN The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs WINN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs WINN Cost
Overpaying WINN vs FELG
$7,522
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
WINN 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | WINN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,023 | $695 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,921 | $2,640 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,271 | $7,522 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.57%WINN
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
WINN 50th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs WINN Dividends
- FELG 0.37%, better
- WINN 0.00%
- FELG $0.16
- WINN None
- FELG $0.04
- WINN
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- WINN
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- WINN
- FELG Quarterly
- WINN
Distribution history
FELG vs WINN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%WINN 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93WINN 1.03
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%WINN −32.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23WINN 1.23Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
FELG and WINN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
