Skip to content
etf.net

LRGC vs WINN

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN)

WINNBNYSE

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.18pt a year

LRGC0.39%WINN0.57%

Avg volume · 30D

WINN 3.1×the volume

LRGC34.1KWINN106K

3Y return · a year

WINN +1.7pt

LRGC+21.5%WINN+23.2%

LRGC vs WINN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.5%LRGC+1.8%WINN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LRGC +9.5%. WINN +1.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
WINN 0.57%
Fund size
LRGC $1.37B
WINN $1.19B
1Y total return
LRGC +9.5%, better
WINN +1.8%
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%, better
WINN 0.00%
Holdings
LRGC 72
WINN 75
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh
WINN 106K sh, better
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
WINN $32.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. WINN: Cost 47, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings 62, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, WINN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCWINN
Cost30% weightA82HigherC47
Mission25% weightA79Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherC48
Tradability15% weightA75HigherA71
Holdings10% weightA77HigherB62
Durability5% weightA78A79Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and WINN are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and WINN 32nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 32BFBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 56
  6. Rank 32BWINNHarbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN)Score 56
  7. Rank 35BFMAGFidelity Magellan ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

WINNBHarbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN)

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

WINN Jennison Associates, the boutique behind Harbor's flagship growth franchise, picks roughly 70 US growth names here. Concentrated by design, non-diversified by the prospectus's own label, and priced like the active fund it is.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

WINN The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com
  • WINN Genuinely active: Jennison's team builds the portfolio bottom-up from company research, and the prospectus labels the fund non-diversified, so a high-conviction name can actually move it.sec.govharborcapital.com
  • About 70 stocks, not 500. You are buying a judgment call on which US mid- and large-cap growers compound, not a slice of every name in a growth index.sec.gov
  • Launched in 2022 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate daily volume, the usual foundation for workable spreads on retail-sized orders.

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.
  • WINN At 0.57% it sits a shade above the peer median (0.54%) and several times the cost of systematic rivals like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%).
  • Concentration cuts both ways: with roughly 70 growth names and a non-diversified mandate, a rough stretch for high-growth stocks has little else to cushion it.sec.gov
  • The stated objective is long-term growth of capital, so income is not what this portfolio is built to produce.

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full WINN profile⁠

LRGC vs WINN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs WINN Cost

Overpaying WINN vs LRGC

$3,373

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • WINN 0.57%

    $11,271

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • WINN 0.57%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530WINN $11,271LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCWINNOverpaying
10$705$1,023$318
20$2,725$3,921$1,196
30$7,898$11,271$3,373

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 0.57%WINN
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

WINN 50th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs WINN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%, better
WINN 0.00%
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
WINN None
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
WINN No data
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
WINN No data
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
WINN No data
Frequency
LRGC Annual
WINN No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
WINN2 paymentsAll WINN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2022 $0.0083; Dec 21, 2023 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

LRGC vs WINN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%, betterWINN 17.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26, betterWINN 1.03
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023WINN −32.1%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00WINN 1.23

LRGC and WINN in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WINNBvsJUSAA

    Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WINNBvsGUSEA

    Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WINNBvsFELGA

    Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.