Skip to content
etf.net

GUSE vs WINN

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN)

WINNBNYSE

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.27pt a year

GUSE0.30%WINN0.57%

Avg volume · 30D

WINN 4.3×the volume

GUSE24.9KWINN106K

GUSE vs WINN Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+5.9%WINN

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. WINN +5.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
WINN 0.57%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
WINN $1.19B
1Y total return
GUSE No data
WINN +1.8%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
WINN 0.00%
Holdings
GUSE 122
WINN 75
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh
WINN 106K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
WINN $32.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. WINN: Cost 47, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings 62, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, WINN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSEWINN
Cost30% weightA97HigherC47
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94HigherC48
Tradability15% weightC46A71Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherB62
Durability5% weightA85HigherA79

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and WINN are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and WINN 32nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 32BFBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 32BWINNHarbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN)Score 56
  6. Rank 35BFMAGFidelity Magellan ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

WINNBHarbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN)

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

WINN Jennison Associates, the boutique behind Harbor's flagship growth franchise, picks roughly 70 US growth names here. Concentrated by design, non-diversified by the prospectus's own label, and priced like the active fund it is.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

WINN The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • WINN Genuinely active: Jennison's team builds the portfolio bottom-up from company research, and the prospectus labels the fund non-diversified, so a high-conviction name can actually move it.sec.govharborcapital.com
  • About 70 stocks, not 500. You are buying a judgment call on which US mid- and large-cap growers compound, not a slice of every name in a growth index.sec.gov
  • Launched in 2022 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate daily volume, the usual foundation for workable spreads on retail-sized orders.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • WINN At 0.57% it sits a shade above the peer median (0.54%) and several times the cost of systematic rivals like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%).
  • Concentration cuts both ways: with roughly 70 growth names and a non-diversified mandate, a rough stretch for high-growth stocks has little else to cushion it.sec.gov
  • The stated objective is long-term growth of capital, so income is not what this portfolio is built to produce.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full WINN profile⁠

GUSE vs WINN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs WINN Cost

Overpaying WINN vs GUSE

$5,122

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • WINN 0.57%

    $11,271

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • WINN 0.57%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530WINN $11,271GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSEWINNOverpaying
10$545$1,023$478
20$2,113$3,921$1,808
30$6,149$11,271$5,122

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.57%WINN
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

WINN 50th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs WINN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
WINN 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
WINN None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
WINN No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
WINN No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
WINN No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
WINN No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
WINN2 paymentsAll WINN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2022 $0.0083; Dec 21, 2023 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GUSE vs WINN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataWINN 17.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataWINN 1.03
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataWINN −32.1%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93WINN 1.23

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WINNBvsJUSAA

    Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WINNBvsLRGCA

    Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WINNBvsFELGA

    Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.