FMAT ranks 2nd and METL 14th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
FMAT vs METL
FMAT −0.91pt a year
0.08%0.99%
FMAT 3.8×the volume
57.1K15.1K
FMAT vs METL Performance
+18.7%−3.0%
- FMAT 0.08%, better
- METL 0.99%
- FMAT $574M
- METL $65M
- FMAT +18.7%, better
- METL −3.0%
- FMAT 1.40%
- METL
- FMAT 107
- METL 46
- FMAT 57.1K sh, better
- METL 15.1K sh
- FMAT $58.45
- METL $22.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAT | METL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F1 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57Higher | F3 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | C48 | A72Higher |
| Durability | C52Higher | D27 |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. FMAT and METL are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMATA
METLF
In short
FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.
METL Sprott's stock-picking answer to a sector ruled by cheap index trackers: about 40 global metals and mining names chosen by a manager, in a plain ETF wrapper. Active conviction, active price tag.
Stated mandate
FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.
METL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAT vs METL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAT vs METL Cost
Overpaying METL vs FMAT
$16,752
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAT 0.084%
$1,773
METL 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAT | METL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $1,746 | $1,592 |
| 20 | $603 | $6,565 | $5,962 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $18,525 | $16,752 |
- 0.08%FMAT, cheaper
- 0.99%METL
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
METL 14th cheapest of 14 funds
FMAT vs METL Dividends
- FMAT 1.40%
- METL
- FMAT $0.82
- METL
- FMAT $0.20
- METL $0.25
- FMAT Sep 18, 2026
- METL Dec 18, 2025
- FMAT Sep 22, 2026
- METL Dec 22, 2025
- FMAT Quarterly
- METL Irregular
Distribution history
FMAT vs METL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAT 17.3%METL 41.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAT 0.54METL 0.11
- Worst fall
- FMAT −25.4%METL −34.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FMAT 0.98METL 1.60
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.