Skip to content

FMAT vs METL

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

FMATANYSE Arca

Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF

METLFNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

FMAT −0.91pt a year

FMAT0.08%METL0.99%

Avg volume · 30D

FMAT 3.8×the volume

FMAT57.1KMETL15.1K

FMAT vs METL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.7%FMAT−3.0%METL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FMAT +18.7%. METL −3.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%30%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FMAT 0.08%, better
METL 0.99%
Fund size
FMAT $574M
METL $65M
1Y total return
FMAT +18.7%, better
METL −3.0%
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.40%
METL No data
Holdings
FMAT 107
METL 46
Avg volume (30D)
FMAT 57.1K sh, better
METL 15.1K sh
NAV per share
FMAT $58.45
METL $22.02
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAT: Cost 95, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings 48, Durability 52. METL: Cost 1, Risk 3, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 72, Durability 27.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAT, METL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMATMETL
Cost30% weightA95HigherF1
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB57HigherF3
Tradability15% weightB55HigherF13
Holdings10% weightC48A72Higher
Durability5% weightC52HigherD27

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAT and METL are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

FMAT ranks 2nd and METL 14th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BVAWVanguard Materials ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 13DSLXVanEck Steel ETFScore 33
  5. Rank 14FMETLSprott Active Metals & Miners ETFScore 15

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMATAFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

METLFSprott Active Metals & Miners ETF

In short

FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.

METL Sprott's stock-picking answer to a sector ruled by cheap index trackers: about 40 global metals and mining names chosen by a manager, in a plain ETF wrapper. Active conviction, active price tag.

Stated mandate

FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.

METL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • FMAT Costs 0.08% a year, tied with XLB for the lowest fee among materials ETFs and a fraction of what the typical fund in the group charges.
  • Tracks MSCI's investable-market index, so the basket reaches past the mega caps into mid and small caps: roughly 120 holdings, not a dozen giants.fidelity.com
  • Does what the label says. Its returns have hugged its stated MSCI materials index, one of the stronger index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2013 with a multi-hundred-million-dollar asset base and quarterly distributions.
  • METL A concentrated book of roughly 40 global metals and miners, picked by a manager rather than inherited from a broad materials index.
  • The mandate is global, so the manager can own miners listed outside the US, unlike domestic-only materials funds such as IYM.
  • Ordinary plumbing: a 1940 Act fund holding stocks, not futures or partnerships. That means 1099 reporting and no K-1 at tax time.

Worth knowing

  • FMAT One sector, and a cyclical one. Materials profits ride commodity prices and industrial demand, so this can move a long way from the broad market in either direction.
  • US-listed companies only, so the big Australian, Canadian and European miners sit outside the basket.fidelity.com
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume leader, so spreads can run wider than at the busiest materials funds, especially in fast markets.
  • METL 0.99% a year buys the stock picking. The category's index options (XLB, VAW, FMAT) charge under 0.10%, so the manager starts each year well behind them.
  • Launched in 2025, so there is no full mining cycle on the record yet to judge the manager's calls against.
  • Trades lightly next to the category's heavyweights, which tends to mean wider spreads. Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full FMAT profile⁠

Full METL profile⁠

FMAT vs METL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAT vs METL Cost

Overpaying METL vs FMAT

$16,752

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAT 0.084%

    $1,773

  • METL 0.99%

    $18,525

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAT 0.084%
  • METL 0.99%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530METL $18,525FMAT $1,773

Year by year

YearFMATMETLOverpaying
10$154$1,746$1,592
20$603$6,565$5,962
30$1,773$18,525$16,752

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FMAT, cheaper
  • 0.99%METL
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds

METL 14th cheapest of 14 funds

FMAT vs METL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.40%
METL No data
Payout (12M)
FMAT $0.82
METL No data
Last payment
FMAT $0.20
METL $0.25
Ex-dividend
FMAT Sep 18, 2026
METL Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
FMAT Sep 22, 2026
METL Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
FMAT Quarterly
METL Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FMATQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FMAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.14; Jun 15, 2018 $0.16; Sep 21, 2018 $0.15; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.13; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.16; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 20, 2020 $0.21; Jun 19, 2020 $0.15; Sep 18, 2020 $0.17; Dec 18, 2020 $0.17; Mar 19, 2021 $0.16; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.20; Dec 17, 2021 $0.19; Mar 18, 2022 $0.20; Jun 17, 2022 $0.27; Sep 16, 2022 $0.20; Dec 16, 2022 $0.21; Mar 17, 2023 $0.20; Jun 16, 2023 $0.21; Sep 15, 2023 $0.21; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Mar 15, 2024 $0.21; Jun 21, 2024 $0.19; Sep 20, 2024 $0.21; Dec 20, 2024 $0.21; Mar 21, 2025 $0.22; Jun 20, 2025 $0.22; Sep 19, 2025 $0.22; Dec 19, 2025 $0.21; Mar 20, 2026 $0.20; Jun 18, 2026 $0.21; Sep 18, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
METLIrregular · 1 paymentAll METL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2025 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FMAT vs METL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAT 17.3%METL 41.8%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAT 0.54METL 0.11since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAT −25.4%METL −34.4%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAT 0.98METL 1.60

Popular comparisons

  • FMATAvsXLBA

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • METLFvsXLBA

    Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATAvsVAWB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • METLFvsVAWB

    Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATAvsXMEB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • METLFvsXMEB

    Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.