Skip to content

METL vs XLB

Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF

METLFNasdaq

State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLBANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XLB −0.91pt a year

METL0.99%XLB0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLB 739.5×the volume

METL15.1KXLB11.1M

METL vs XLB Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−3.0%METL+25.3%XLB

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. METL −3.0%. XLB +25.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
METL 0.99%
XLB 0.08%, better
Fund size
METL $65M
XLB $8.3B
1Y total return
METL −3.0%
XLB +25.3%, better
Yield (12M)
METL No data
XLB 1.64%
Holdings
METL 46
XLB 27
Avg volume (30D)
METL 15.1K sh
XLB 11.1M sh, better
NAV per share
METL $22.02
XLB $52.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

METL: Cost 1, Risk 3, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 72, Durability 27. XLB: Cost 95, Risk 76, Mission 83, Tradability 99, Holdings 43, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for METL, XLB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMETLXLB
Cost30% weightF1A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA83
Risk15% weightF3A76Higher
Tradability15% weightF13A99Higher
Holdings10% weightA72HigherC43
Durability5% weightD27A81Higher

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. METL and XLB are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

XLB ranks 1st and METL 14th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 13DSLXVanEck Steel ETFScore 33
  4. Rank 14FMETLSprott Active Metals & Miners ETFScore 15

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

METLFSprott Active Metals & Miners ETF

XLBAState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

METL Sprott's stock-picking answer to a sector ruled by cheap index trackers: about 40 global metals and mining names chosen by a manager, in a plain ETF wrapper. Active conviction, active price tag.

XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.

Stated mandate

METL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.

Why people hold it

  • METL A concentrated book of roughly 40 global metals and miners, picked by a manager rather than inherited from a broad materials index.
  • The mandate is global, so the manager can own miners listed outside the US, unlike domestic-only materials funds such as IYM.
  • Ordinary plumbing: a 1940 Act fund holding stocks, not futures or partnerships. That means 1099 reporting and no K-1 at tax time.
  • XLB Charges 0.08% a year against a peer-group median of 0.38%, and nothing in the cohort undercuts it (FMAT matches).
  • Trading since December 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.sec.gov
  • Very actively traded for a sector fund, which is the whole point if you use it for tactical tilts rather than buy-and-forget.
  • Clean mandate: chemicals, metals and mining, paper and forest products, containers and packaging, construction materials. No thematic drift.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • METL 0.99% a year buys the stock picking. The category's index options (XLB, VAW, FMAT) charge under 0.10%, so the manager starts each year well behind them.
  • Launched in 2025, so there is no full mining cycle on the record yet to judge the manager's calls against.
  • Trades lightly next to the category's heavyweights, which tends to mean wider spreads. Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • XLB Around 26 stocks, and index rules let one name reach 25% at a quarter-end measurement. A couple of chemical giants carry outsized weight.sec.gov
  • The universe is the S&P 500 only. Smaller miners and specialty producers sit outside the net, which is the water VAW and XME fish in.ssga.com
  • One sector, tied to commodity prices and building demand, so it can travel a very different path from the broad market. Distributions come quarterly.ssga.com

Full METL profile⁠

Full XLB profile⁠

METL vs XLB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

METL vs XLB Cost

Overpaying METL vs XLB

$16,836

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • METL 0.99%

    $18,525

  • XLB 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • METL 0.99%
  • XLB 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530METL $18,525XLB $1,689

Year by year

YearMETLXLBOverpaying
10$1,746$147$1,599
20$6,565$575$5,990
30$18,525$1,689$16,836

Expense ratio

  • 0.99%METL
  • 0.08%XLB, cheaper
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

XLB cheapest of 14 funds

METL 14th cheapest of 14 funds

METL vs XLB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
METL No data
XLB 1.64%
Payout (12M)
METL No data
XLB $0.86
Last payment
METL $0.25
XLB $0.23
Ex-dividend
METL Dec 18, 2025
XLB Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
METL Dec 22, 2025
XLB Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
METL Irregular
XLB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

METLIrregular · 1 paymentAll METL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2025 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XLBQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.08; Jun 16, 2017 $0.13; Sep 15, 2017 $0.15; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.14; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.16; Mar 15, 2019 $0.12; Jun 21, 2019 $0.17; Sep 20, 2019 $0.15; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.13; Jun 22, 2020 $0.15; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.18; Mar 22, 2021 $0.16; Jun 21, 2021 $0.17; Sep 20, 2021 $0.18; Dec 20, 2021 $0.22; Mar 21, 2022 $0.16; Jun 21, 2022 $0.26; Sep 19, 2022 $0.20; Dec 19, 2022 $0.25; Mar 20, 2023 $0.16; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 18, 2024 $0.16; Jun 24, 2024 $0.21; Sep 23, 2024 $0.21; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 24, 2025 $0.20; Jun 23, 2025 $0.22; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $0.23; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.19; Sep 21, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

METL vs XLB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
METL 41.8%since Oct 2025XLB 16.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
METL 0.11since Oct 2025XLB 0.59
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
METL −34.4%since Sep 2025XLB −24.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
METL 1.60XLB 0.82

METL and XLB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • METLFvsFMATA

    Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsFMATA

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • METLFvsVAWB

    Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsVAWB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • METLFvsXMEB

    Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsXMEB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.