XME ranks 4th and METL 14th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
METL vs XME
XME −0.64pt a year
0.99%0.35%
XME 121.6×the volume
15.1K1.83M
METL vs XME Performance
−3.0%+1.6%
- METL 0.99%
- XME 0.35%, better
- METL $65M
- XME $3.84B
- METL −3.0%
- XME +1.6%, better
- METL
- XME 0.35%
- METL 46
- XME 39
- METL 15.1K sh
- XME 1.83M sh, better
- METL $22.02
- XME $101.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METL | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F1 | B61Higher |
| Mission | C52 | |
| Risk | F3 | D29Higher |
| Tradability | F13 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | B67 |
| Durability | D27 | A70Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. METL and XME are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METLF
XMEB
In short
METL Sprott's stock-picking answer to a sector ruled by cheap index trackers: about 40 global metals and mining names chosen by a manager, in a plain ETF wrapper. Active conviction, active price tag.
XME Not the chemicals-heavy materials fund. XME holds roughly 40 miners and steelmakers on a modified equal weight, so a small copper name carries about the weight of a giant. Ore, coal and metal, since 2006.
Stated mandate
METL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
XME The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METL vs XME Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METL vs XME Cost
Overpaying METL vs XME
$11,399
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METL 0.99%
$18,525
XME 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METL | XME | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $634 | $1,112 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $2,454 | $4,111 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $7,126 | $11,399 |
- 0.99%METL
- 0.35%XME, cheaper
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XME 6th cheapest of 14 funds
METL 14th cheapest of 14 funds
METL vs XME Dividends
- METL
- XME 0.35%
- METL
- XME $0.34
- METL $0.25
- XME $0.07
- METL Dec 18, 2025
- XME Sep 21, 2026
- METL Dec 22, 2025
- XME Sep 23, 2026
- METL Irregular
- XME Quarterly
Distribution history
METL vs XME Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METL 41.8%XME 29.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- METL 0.11XME 0.79
- Worst fall
- METL −34.4%XME −37.3%
- Market sensitivity
- METL 1.60XME 1.32
METL and XME in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
