Skip to content

FMAT vs RSPM

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

FMATANYSE Arca

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF

RSPMCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FMAT −0.32pt a year

FMAT0.08%RSPM0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

FMAT 2.3×the volume

FMAT57.1KRSPM25.2K

10Y return · a year

RSPM +1.1pt

FMAT+10.1%RSPM+11.2%

FMAT vs RSPM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+34.2%FMAT+31.4%RSPM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FMAT +34.2%. RSPM +31.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%10%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FMAT 0.08%, better
RSPM 0.40%
Fund size
FMAT $574M
RSPM $184M
1Y total return
FMAT +18.7%
RSPM +29.5%, better
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.40%
RSPM 1.71%, better
Holdings
FMAT 107
RSPM 27
Avg volume (30D)
FMAT 57.1K sh, better
RSPM 25.2K sh
NAV per share
FMAT $58.45
RSPM $40.36
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAT: Cost 95, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings 48, Durability 52. RSPM: Cost 31, Risk 65, Mission 77, Tradability 37, Holdings 70, Durability 42.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAT, RSPM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMATRSPM
Cost30% weightA95HigherD31
Mission25% weightNot scoredA77
Risk15% weightB57B65Higher
Tradability15% weightB55HigherD37
Holdings10% weightC48A70Higher
Durability5% weightC52HigherC42

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAT and RSPM are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

FMAT ranks 2nd and RSPM 8th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BVAWVanguard Materials ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 7CPSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 8CRSPMInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 9CPICKiShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMATAFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

RSPMCInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF

In short

FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.

RSPM Materials, cut into even slices. RSPM gives every materials stock in the S&P 500 the same weight, so the sector's smallest name counts as much as its largest, and it has run that way since 2006.

Stated mandate

FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.

RSPM The fund tracks an index that equally weights stocks in the materials sector of the S&P 500® Index.

Why people hold it

  • FMAT Costs 0.08% a year, tied with XLB for the lowest fee among materials ETFs and a fraction of what the typical fund in the group charges.
  • Tracks MSCI's investable-market index, so the basket reaches past the mega caps into mid and small caps: roughly 120 holdings, not a dozen giants.fidelity.com
  • Does what the label says. Its returns have hugged its stated MSCI materials index, one of the stronger index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2013 with a multi-hundred-million-dollar asset base and quarterly distributions.
  • RSPM Equal weighting is the whole point: each S&P 500 materials name gets the same slice, so a few giant chemical and industrial-gas stocks do not set the tone.invesco.com
  • The index resets holdings back toward equal weight instead of letting winners compound into outsized positions, which keeps the tilt toward the sector's smaller members intact.invesco.com
  • Trading since 2006 on the same rulebook, through multiple commodity cycles. Distributions come quarterly.
  • It stays on task: the portfolio tracks its equal-weight materials index closely rather than wandering into adjacent sectors.

Worth knowing

  • FMAT One sector, and a cyclical one. Materials profits ride commodity prices and industrial demand, so this can move a long way from the broad market in either direction.
  • US-listed companies only, so the big Australian, Canadian and European miners sit outside the basket.fidelity.com
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume leader, so spreads can run wider than at the busiest materials funds, especially in fast markets.
  • RSPM At 0.40% a year it runs above the typical materials ETF, and cap-weighted rivals such as XLB and VAW charge a fraction of that for the same sector.
  • Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can be wider than on the sector's most heavily traded funds.
  • Around two dozen stocks in one cyclical corner of the market, and equal weighting leans harder on the smaller names than a cap-weighted fund does.

Full FMAT profile⁠

Full RSPM profile⁠

FMAT vs RSPM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAT vs RSPM Cost

Overpaying RSPM vs FMAT

$6,317

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAT 0.084%

    $1,773

  • RSPM 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAT 0.084%
  • RSPM 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530RSPM $8,090FMAT $1,773

Year by year

YearFMATRSPMOverpaying
10$154$723$569
20$603$2,793$2,190
30$1,773$8,090$6,317

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FMAT, cheaper
  • 0.40%RSPM
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds

RSPM 11th cheapest of 14 funds

FMAT vs RSPM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.40%
RSPM 1.71%, better
Payout (12M)
FMAT $0.82
RSPM $0.69
Last payment
FMAT $0.20
RSPM $0.18
Ex-dividend
FMAT Sep 18, 2026
RSPM Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FMAT Sep 22, 2026
RSPM Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FMAT Quarterly
RSPM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FMATQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FMAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.14; Jun 15, 2018 $0.16; Sep 21, 2018 $0.15; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.13; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.16; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 20, 2020 $0.21; Jun 19, 2020 $0.15; Sep 18, 2020 $0.17; Dec 18, 2020 $0.17; Mar 19, 2021 $0.16; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.20; Dec 17, 2021 $0.19; Mar 18, 2022 $0.20; Jun 17, 2022 $0.27; Sep 16, 2022 $0.20; Dec 16, 2022 $0.21; Mar 17, 2023 $0.20; Jun 16, 2023 $0.21; Sep 15, 2023 $0.21; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Mar 15, 2024 $0.21; Jun 21, 2024 $0.19; Sep 20, 2024 $0.21; Dec 20, 2024 $0.21; Mar 21, 2025 $0.22; Jun 20, 2025 $0.22; Sep 19, 2025 $0.22; Dec 19, 2025 $0.21; Mar 20, 2026 $0.20; Jun 18, 2026 $0.21; Sep 18, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
RSPMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RSPM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.08; Jun 16, 2017 $0.08; Sep 15, 2017 $0.09; Dec 15, 2017 $0.09; Mar 16, 2018 $0.04; Jun 15, 2018 $0.07; Sep 24, 2018 $0.10; Dec 24, 2018 $0.13; Mar 18, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2019 $0.11; Sep 23, 2019 $0.11; Dec 23, 2019 $0.11; Mar 23, 2020 $0.12; Jun 22, 2020 $0.11; Sep 21, 2020 $0.11; Dec 21, 2020 $0.10; Mar 22, 2021 $0.13; Jun 21, 2021 $0.12; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.14; Mar 21, 2022 $0.15; Jun 21, 2022 $0.18; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.21; Mar 20, 2023 $0.17; Jun 20, 2023 $0.17; Sep 18, 2023 $0.17; Dec 18, 2023 $0.18; Mar 18, 2024 $0.16; Jun 24, 2024 $0.16; Sep 23, 2024 $0.17; Dec 23, 2024 $0.17; Mar 24, 2025 $0.18; Jun 23, 2025 $0.17; Sep 22, 2025 $0.18; Dec 22, 2025 $0.17; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.27; Sep 21, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FMAT vs RSPM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FMAT
  • RSPM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FMAT −25.4% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAT 17.3%RSPM 17.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAT 0.54RSPM 0.55, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAT −25.4%, betterRSPM −27.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAT 0.98RSPM 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • FMATAvsXLBA

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPMCvsXLBA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATAvsVAWB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPMCvsVAWB

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATAvsXMEB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPMCvsXMEB

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.