XLB ranks 1st and RSPM 8th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
RSPM vs XLB
XLB −0.32pt a year
0.40%0.08%
XLB 442.7×the volume
25.2K11.1M
RSPM +0.5pt
+11.2%+10.7%
RSPM vs XLB Performance
+31.4%+36.8%
- RSPM 0.40%
- XLB 0.08%, better
- RSPM $184M
- XLB $8.3B
- RSPM +29.5%, better
- XLB +25.3%
- RSPM 1.71%, better
- XLB 1.64%
- RSPM 27
- XLB 27
- RSPM 25.2K sh
- XLB 11.1M sh, better
- RSPM $40.36
- XLB $52.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSPM | XLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A77 | A83Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A99Higher |
| Holdings | A70Higher | C43 |
| Durability | C42 | A81Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. RSPM and XLB are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSPMC
XLBA
In short
RSPM Materials, cut into even slices. RSPM gives every materials stock in the S&P 500 the same weight, so the sector's smallest name counts as much as its largest, and it has run that way since 2006.
XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.
Stated mandate
RSPM The fund tracks an index that equally weights stocks in the materials sector of the S&P 500® Index.
XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSPM vs XLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSPM vs XLB Cost
Overpaying RSPM vs XLB
$6,401
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSPM 0.40%
$8,090
XLB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSPM | XLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $147 | $576 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $575 | $2,218 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,689 | $6,401 |
- 0.40%RSPM
- 0.08%XLB, cheaper
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLB cheapest of 14 funds
RSPM 11th cheapest of 14 funds
RSPM vs XLB Dividends
- RSPM 1.71%, better
- XLB 1.64%
- RSPM $0.69
- XLB $0.86
- RSPM $0.18
- XLB $0.23
- RSPM Sep 21, 2026
- XLB Sep 21, 2026
- RSPM Sep 25, 2026
- XLB Sep 23, 2026
- RSPM Quarterly
- XLB Quarterly
Distribution history
RSPM vs XLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RSPM
- XLB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSPM 17.3%XLB 16.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RSPM 0.55XLB 0.59, better
- Worst fall
- RSPM −27.2%XLB −24.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RSPM 0.83XLB 0.82
RSPM and XLB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





