SLVP ranks 3rd and GDXJ 8th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDXJ vs SLVP
SLVP −0.13pt a year
0.52%0.39%
GDXJ 17.6×the volume
4.44M253K
GDXJ +0.4pt
+10.5%+10.1%
GDXJ vs SLVP Performance
+137.4%+123.1%
- GDXJ 0.52%
- SLVP 0.39%, better
- GDXJ $7.08B
- SLVP $730M
- GDXJ +3.6%
- SLVP +11.4%, better
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- SLVP 2.43%
- GDXJ 157
- SLVP 47
- GDXJ 4.44M sh, better
- SLVP 253K sh
- GDXJ $95.57
- SLVP $28.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDXJ | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | D37 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A71 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A85Higher | F21 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A79 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDXJ and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXJB
SLVPB
In short
GDXJ The junior tier of the gold trade. GDXJ tracks an index of small-cap gold and silver miners, about 120 names worldwide, and has done so since 2009. It owns the up-and-comers rather than the household-name majors.
SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.
Stated mandate
GDXJ GDXJ seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, which represents small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and/or silver mining.
SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDXJ vs SLVP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDXJ vs SLVP Cost
Overpaying GDXJ vs SLVP
$2,453
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDXJ 0.52%
$10,351
SLVP 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDXJ | SLVP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $705 | $230 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $2,725 | $868 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $7,898 | $2,453 |
- 0.52%GDXJ
- 0.39%SLVP, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds
GDXJ 10th cheapest of 18 funds
GDXJ vs SLVP Dividends
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- SLVP 2.43%
- GDXJ $2.65
- SLVP $0.70
- GDXJ $2.65
- SLVP $0.14
- GDXJ Dec 22, 2025
- SLVP Jun 15, 2026
- GDXJ Dec 26, 2025
- SLVP Jun 18, 2026
- GDXJ Annual
- SLVP Twice a year
Distribution history
GDXJ vs SLVP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GDXJ
- SLVP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDXJ 45.7%, betterSLVP 49.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GDXJ 0.93SLVP 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- GDXJ −48.8%SLVP −47.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GDXJ 0.88SLVP 1.21
GDXJ and SLVP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




