Skip to content

GLDW vs ROM

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF

GLDWCCboe

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ROM −0.06pt a year

GLDW0.99%ROM0.93%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 5.4×the volume

GLDW9.36KROM50.3K

GLDW vs ROM Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

−1.5%GLDW+23.8%ROM

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GLDW −1.5%. ROM +23.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%40%60%80%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GLDW 0.99%
ROM 0.93%, better
Fund size
GLDW $18M
ROM $962M
1Y total return
GLDW −1.5%
ROM +23.8%, better
Yield (12M)
GLDW No data
ROM 0.03%
Holdings
GLDW 3
ROM 86
Avg volume (30D)
GLDW 9.36K sh
ROM 50.3K sh, better
NAV per share
GLDW $37.35
ROM $110.30
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLDW: Cost 24, Risk 50, Mission 60, Tradability 70, Holdings 40, Durability 60. ROM: Cost 70, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 52, Durability 80.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLDW, ROM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLDWROM
Cost30% weightF24A70Higher
Mission25% weightB60Not scored
Risk15% weightC50HigherC49
Tradability15% weightA70A88Higher
Holdings10% weightC40C52Higher
Durability5% weightB60A80Higher

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GLDW and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and GLDW 34th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 76
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 70
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 33CAIBUDirexion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 34CGLDWRoundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETFScore 43
  7. Rank 35CFNGGDirexion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLDWCRoundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

In short

GLDW Gold, geared, on a payday schedule. GLDW targets 1.2 times the SPDR Gold Trust's weekly total return before fees and distributes weekly, a milder, week-by-week take on leverage in a cohort built around 3x daily resets.

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

Stated mandate

GLDW GLDW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns equal to 1.2 times the weekly total return of the SPDR Gold Trust, before fees and expenses.

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

  • GLDW Gentle leverage by category standards: 1.2x, measured over a calendar week instead of a single day, so the compounding drag from daily resets doesn't apply the same way.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Weekly payouts on a gold-linked fund, rare packaging in a corner of the market where most products pay nothing at all.roundhillinvestments.com
  • 0.99% expense ratio, a touch below the typical leveraged bull fund and level with long-running names like QLD (0.98%) and DDM (0.96%).
  • Bullion exposure comes through a 1940 Act fund tracking the largest US gold trust, not a futures roll or a physical vault account you manage yourself.
  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

Worth knowing

  • GLDW Payouts can include return of capital, meaning part of a distribution may be your own principal coming back rather than investment income.
  • Leverage runs both directions: down weeks in gold hit 1.2x too, and results over stretches longer than one week can drift from that multiple.
  • A small, lightly traded fund launched in 2025, so there's little history to judge and bid-ask spreads can be wider than in the category's veterans.
  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

Full GLDW profile⁠

Full ROM profile⁠

GLDW vs ROM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GLDW vs ROM Cost

Overpaying GLDW vs ROM

$986

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GLDW 0.99%

    $18,525

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GLDW 0.99%
  • ROM 0.93%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GLDW $18,525ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearGLDWROMOverpaying
10$1,746$1,644$102
20$6,565$6,199$366
30$18,525$17,539$986

Expense ratio

  • 0.99%GLDW
  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

GLDW 75th cheapest of 95 funds

GLDW vs ROM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
GLDW No data
ROM 0.03%
Payout (12M)
GLDW No data
ROM $0.04
Last payment
GLDW $0.14
ROM $0.02
Ex-dividend
GLDW Nov 9, 2026
ROM Mar 25, 2026
Paid on
GLDW Pays Nov 10, 2026
ROM Mar 31, 2026
Frequency
GLDW Weekly
ROM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

GLDWWeekly · 45 paymentsAll GLDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 45 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 5, 2026 $0.35; Jan 12, 2026 $0.10; Jan 20, 2026 $0.32; Jan 26, 2026 $0.56; Feb 2, 2026 $0.41; Feb 9, 2026 $0.28; Feb 17, 2026 $0.39; Feb 23, 2026 $0.41; Mar 2, 2026 $0.46; Mar 9, 2026 $0.47; Mar 16, 2026 $0.35; Mar 23, 2026 $0.31; Mar 30, 2026 $0.09; Apr 6, 2026 $0.42; Apr 13, 2026 $0.44; Apr 20, 2026 $0.36; Apr 27, 2026 $0.35; May 4, 2026 $0.20; May 11, 2026 $0.22; May 18, 2026 $0.32; May 26, 2026 $0.18; Jun 1, 2026 $0.23; Jun 8, 2026 $0.27; Jun 15, 2026 $0.14; Jun 22, 2026 $0.18; Jun 29, 2026 $0.24; Jul 6, 2026 $0.16; Jul 13, 2026 $0.25; Jul 20, 2026 $0.20; Jul 27, 2026 $0.17; Aug 3, 2026 $0.23; Aug 10, 2026 $0.20; Aug 17, 2026 $0.26; Aug 24, 2026 $0.24; Aug 31, 2026 $0.30; Sep 8, 2026 $0.17; Sep 14, 2026 $0.23; Sep 21, 2026 $0.19; Sep 28, 2026 $0.20; Oct 5, 2026 $0.16; Oct 13, 2026 $0.13; Oct 19, 2026 $0.19; Oct 26, 2026 $0.19; Nov 2, 2026 $0.11; Nov 9, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
ROMQuarterly · 1 paymentAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2026 YTD. Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

GLDW vs ROM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLDW 33.0%since Nov 2025ROM 49.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLDW −0.24since Nov 2025ROM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLDW −35.4%since Oct 2025ROM −67.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GLDW 0.37ROM 3.09

Popular comparisons

  • GLDWCvsQLDA

    Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLDWCvsUYGA

    Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLDWCvsDDMB

    Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.