ROM ranks 3rd and GLDW 34th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
GLDW vs ROM
ROM −0.06pt a year
0.99%0.93%
ROM 5.4×the volume
9.36K50.3K
GLDW vs ROM Performance
−1.5%+23.8%
- GLDW 0.99%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- GLDW $18M
- ROM $962M
- GLDW −1.5%
- ROM +23.8%, better
- GLDW
- ROM 0.03%
- GLDW 3
- ROM 86
- GLDW 9.36K sh
- ROM 50.3K sh, better
- GLDW $37.35
- ROM $110.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLDW | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A70Higher |
| Mission | B60 | |
| Risk | C50Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A70 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C40 | C52Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A80Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. GLDW and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLDWC
ROMA
In short
GLDW Gold, geared, on a payday schedule. GLDW targets 1.2 times the SPDR Gold Trust's weekly total return before fees and distributes weekly, a milder, week-by-week take on leverage in a cohort built around 3x daily resets.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
GLDW GLDW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns equal to 1.2 times the weekly total return of the SPDR Gold Trust, before fees and expenses.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLDW vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLDW vs ROM Cost
Overpaying GLDW vs ROM
$986
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLDW 0.99%
$18,525
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLDW | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,644 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $6,199 | $366 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $17,539 | $986 |
- 0.99%GLDW
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
GLDW 75th cheapest of 95 funds
GLDW vs ROM Dividends
- GLDW
- ROM 0.03%
- GLDW
- ROM $0.04
- GLDW $0.14
- ROM $0.02
- GLDW Nov 9, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- GLDW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- GLDW Weekly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
GLDW vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLDW 33.0%ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLDW −0.24ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- GLDW −35.4%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GLDW 0.37ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.