Skip to content

GUSE vs TGRW

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF

TGRWCNYSE Arca

Overlap

44.9%by weight

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.22pt a year

GUSE0.30%TGRW0.52%

Avg volume · 30D

TGRW 2.1×the volume

GUSE24.9KTGRW51.3K

GUSE vs TGRW Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE−2.0%TGRW

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. TGRW −2.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
TGRW 0.52%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
TGRW $1.1B
1Y total return
GUSE No data
TGRW −4.6%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
TGRW 0.00%
Holdings
GUSE 122
TGRW 70
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh
TGRW 51.3K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
TGRW $45.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. TGRW: Cost 55, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 37, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, TGRW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSETGRW
Cost30% weightA97HigherB55
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94HigherD39
Tradability15% weightC46B66Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherD37
Durability5% weightA85A86Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and TGRW are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and TGRW 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 38CTCHPT. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 38CTGRWT. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 41CBRIFFIS Bright Portfolios Focused Equity ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

TGRWCT. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

TGRW T. Rowe Price's first swing at active ETFs, and it doesn't show its cards. TGRW runs a concentrated growth portfolio while publishing a proxy basket instead of a daily holdings list.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

TGRW The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • TGRW Semi-transparent by design: instead of daily holdings, it publishes a proxy portfolio built to track the real book closely, keeping the manager's picks out of public view.troweprice.com
  • A concentrated lineup of roughly 70 stocks picked for earnings and cash flow growth, not an index tracker with a fee stapled on.troweprice.com
  • At 0.52%, it comes in under the typical fund in its conviction-growth peer group, and it sits in the upper half of that group overall.
  • Live since 2020, run by a firm whose reputation was built on hands-on growth stock research rather than index licensing.troweprice.com

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • TGRW Thinly traded next to index heavyweights. T. Rowe itself notes that traders given less holdings information tend to charge more, so the buy/sell gap can widen.troweprice.com
  • Cheaper large-cap growth rivals exist: FELG charges 0.18% and JUSA 0.12%, though both lean on enhanced-index machinery rather than a concentrated stock-picker's book.
  • Growth comes first here. Income is only a secondary objective, and the fund's distribution schedule is annual.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full TGRW profile⁠

GUSE vs TGRW Holdings

How GUSE and TGRW differ

Overlap by weight

44.9%

Shared holdings make up 82.9% of TGRW and 50.5% of GUSE.

Level by level

  • Holdings35 in both44.9%
  • Countryby domicile97.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GUSE.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GUSE and TGRW, widest gap first
CountryMore in GUSEMore in TGRW
United StatesGUSE +2.5 points
NetherlandsTGRW +0.9 points
CanadaTGRW +0.7 points
TaiwanTGRW +0.6 points
Other countries (4)TGRW +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GUSE34.6%
  • TGRW63.4%

Securities held

  • GUSE121
  • TGRW70

Asset class

GUSE
Equity
TGRW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GUSE86
  • In both35
  • Only in TGRW35

Only in GUSE

86 securities, 47.7% of GUSE by weight

  • Coca-Cola Company (The)1.81%
  • Alphabet Inc.1.77%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co1.66%

Only in TGRW

35 securities, 17.1% of TGRW by weight

  • Lam Research1.65%
  • Crowdstrike Holdings1.31%
  • Netflix1.13%

Weight gaps

All 35 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GUSE and TGRW, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GUSEMore in TGRW
NVIDIA CorporationNVDATGRW +9.28 points
Alphabet Inc.GOOGLTGRW +8.43 points
Broadcom Inc.AVGOTGRW +3.01 points
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMDTGRW +2.74 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNGUSE +2.57 points
Meta Platforms Inc-Class AMETATGRW +2.02 points
Apple Inc.AAPLTGRW +1.73 points
Micron Technology, Inc.MUTGRW +1.58 points

All 121 GUSE holdings⁠All 73 TGRW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs TGRW Cost

Overpaying TGRW vs GUSE

$4,202

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • TGRW 0.52%

    $10,351

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • TGRW 0.52%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530TGRW $10,351GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSETGRWOverpaying
10$545$935$390
20$2,113$3,593$1,480
30$6,149$10,351$4,202

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.52%TGRW
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

TGRW 41st cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs TGRW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
TGRW 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
TGRW None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
TGRW No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
TGRW No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
TGRW No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
TGRW No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
TGRW3 paymentsAll TGRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2020 $0.06; Dec 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0034. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

GUSE vs TGRW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataTGRW 17.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataTGRW 0.83
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataTGRW −43.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93TGRW 1.22

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TGRWCvsJUSAA

    T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TGRWCvsLRGCA

    T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TGRWCvsFELGA

    T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.