Skip to content
etf.net

LRGC vs TGRW

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF

TGRWCNYSE Arca

Overlap

37.1%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.13pt a year

LRGC0.39%TGRW0.52%

Avg volume · 30D

TGRW 1.5×the volume

LRGC34.1KTGRW51.3K

3Y return · a year

LRGC +2.6pt

LRGC+21.5%TGRW+18.9%

LRGC vs TGRW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.5%LRGC−4.6%TGRW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LRGC +9.5%. TGRW −4.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
TGRW 0.52%
Fund size
LRGC $1.37B
TGRW $1.1B
1Y total return
LRGC +9.5%, better
TGRW −4.6%
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%, better
TGRW 0.00%
Holdings
LRGC 72
TGRW 70
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh
TGRW 51.3K sh, better
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
TGRW $45.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. TGRW: Cost 55, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 37, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, TGRW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCTGRW
Cost30% weightA82HigherB55
Mission25% weightA79Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherD39
Tradability15% weightA75HigherB66
Holdings10% weightA77HigherD37
Durability5% weightA78A86Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and TGRW are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and TGRW 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 38CTCHPT. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 38CTGRWT. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETFScore 53
  7. Rank 41CBRIFFIS Bright Portfolios Focused Equity ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

TGRWCT. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

TGRW T. Rowe Price's first swing at active ETFs, and it doesn't show its cards. TGRW runs a concentrated growth portfolio while publishing a proxy basket instead of a daily holdings list.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

TGRW The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com
  • TGRW Semi-transparent by design: instead of daily holdings, it publishes a proxy portfolio built to track the real book closely, keeping the manager's picks out of public view.troweprice.com
  • A concentrated lineup of roughly 70 stocks picked for earnings and cash flow growth, not an index tracker with a fee stapled on.troweprice.com
  • At 0.52%, it comes in under the typical fund in its conviction-growth peer group, and it sits in the upper half of that group overall.
  • Live since 2020, run by a firm whose reputation was built on hands-on growth stock research rather than index licensing.troweprice.com

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.
  • TGRW Thinly traded next to index heavyweights. T. Rowe itself notes that traders given less holdings information tend to charge more, so the buy/sell gap can widen.troweprice.com
  • Cheaper large-cap growth rivals exist: FELG charges 0.18% and JUSA 0.12%, though both lean on enhanced-index machinery rather than a concentrated stock-picker's book.
  • Growth comes first here. Income is only a secondary objective, and the fund's distribution schedule is annual.

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full TGRW profile⁠

LRGC vs TGRW Holdings

How LRGC and TGRW differ

Overlap by weight

37.1%

Shared holdings make up 56.9% of TGRW and 48.8% of LRGC.

Level by level

  • Holdings22 in both37.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors75.4%
  • Countryby domicile98.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in LRGC and TGRW, widest gap first
SectorMore in LRGCMore in TGRW
TechnologyTGRW +19.0 points
FinancialsLRGC +7.2 points
CommunicationTGRW +5.5 points
Health CareLRGC +4.3 points
IndustrialsLRGC +4.0 points
EnergyLRGC +3.1 points
Consumer StaplesLRGC +2.5 points
UtilitiesLRGC +1.7 points
Real EstateLRGC +0.7 points
MaterialsLRGC +0.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryLRGC +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LRGC and TGRW, widest gap first
CountryMore in LRGCMore in TGRW
United KingdomLRGC +0.8 points
Other countries (7)TGRW +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LRGC42.5%
  • TGRW63.4%

Securities held

  • LRGC71
  • TGRW70

Asset class

LRGC
Equity
TGRW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LRGC49
  • In both22
  • Only in TGRW48

Only in LRGC

49 securities, 51.1% of LRGC by weight

  • Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.0015.10%
  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock1.79%
  • Rtx Corp Common Stock USD1.01.69%

Only in TGRW

48 securities, 43.1% of TGRW by weight

  • Alphabet Class A11.19%
  • Advanced Micro Devices4.30%
  • Tesla2.37%

Weight gaps

All 22 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in LRGC and TGRW, widest gap first
HoldingMore in LRGCMore in TGRW
NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.001NVDATGRW +9.11 points
Amazon.com Inc Common Stock USD.01AMZNLRGC +3.04 points
Broadcom Inc Common StockAVGOTGRW +2.61 points
Micron Technology Inc Common Stock USD.1MUTGRW +2.60 points
Eli Lilly & Co Common StockLLYTGRW +2.25 points
Meta Platforms Inc Class A Common Stock USD.000006METATGRW +1.46 points
Schwab (Charles) Corp Common Stock USD.01SCHWLRGC +1.41 points
UnitedHealth Group Inc Common Stock USD.01UNHLRGC +1.30 points

All 70 LRGC holdings⁠All 73 TGRW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs TGRW Cost

Overpaying TGRW vs LRGC

$2,453

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • TGRW 0.52%

    $10,351

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • TGRW 0.52%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530TGRW $10,351LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCTGRWOverpaying
10$705$935$230
20$2,725$3,593$868
30$7,898$10,351$2,453

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 0.52%TGRW
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

TGRW 41st cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs TGRW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%, better
TGRW 0.00%
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
TGRW None
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
TGRW No data
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
TGRW No data
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
TGRW No data
Frequency
LRGC Annual
TGRW No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
TGRW3 paymentsAll TGRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2020 $0.06; Dec 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0034. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

LRGC vs TGRW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%, betterTGRW 17.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26, betterTGRW 0.83
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023TGRW −43.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00TGRW 1.22

LRGC and TGRW in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRWCvsJUSAA

    T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRWCvsGUSEA

    T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRWCvsFELGA

    T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.