JUSA ranks 1st and TGRW 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs TGRW
JUSA −0.34pt a year
0.18%0.52%
JUSA 1.9×the volume
98.8K51.3K
JUSA vs TGRW Performance
+10.8%−4.6%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- TGRW 0.52%
- JUSA $745M
- TGRW $1.1B
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- TGRW −4.6%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- TGRW 0.00%
- JUSA 263
- TGRW 70
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- TGRW 51.3K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- TGRW $45.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | TGRW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | B58 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A76 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and TGRW are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
TGRWC
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
TGRW T. Rowe Price's first swing at active ETFs, and it doesn't show its cards. TGRW runs a concentrated growth portfolio while publishing a proxy basket instead of a daily holdings list.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
TGRW The fund seeks long-term capital growth, with income as a secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs TGRW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs TGRW Cost
Overpaying TGRW vs JUSA
$6,602
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
TGRW 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | TGRW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $935 | $607 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,593 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $10,351 | $6,602 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.52%TGRW
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
TGRW 41st cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs TGRW Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- TGRW 0.00%
- JUSA $0.49
- TGRW None
- JUSA $0.13
- TGRW
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- TGRW
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- TGRW
- JUSA Quarterly
- TGRW
Distribution history
JUSA vs TGRW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%TGRW 17.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41TGRW 0.83
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%TGRW −43.3%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98TGRW 1.22
JUSA and TGRW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

