Skip to content

IBAT vs KGRN

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

IBATBNasdaq

KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF

KGRNFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IBAT −0.32pt a year

IBAT0.47%KGRN0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

IBAT 1.8×the volume

IBAT23.8KKGRN13.4K

IBAT vs KGRN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.9%IBAT−30.0%KGRN

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. IBAT +12.9%. KGRN −30.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IBAT 0.47%, better
KGRN 0.79%
Fund size
IBAT $56M
KGRN $42M
1Y total return
IBAT +12.9%, better
KGRN −30.0%
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.85%
KGRN 1.10%, better
Holdings
IBAT 97
KGRN 51
Avg volume (30D)
IBAT 23.8K sh, better
KGRN 13.4K sh
NAV per share
IBAT $35.92
KGRN $21.19
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IBAT: Cost 83, Risk 74, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 56, Durability 36. KGRN: Cost 0, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 16, Holdings 40, Durability 25.
Pillar letters and Scores for IBAT, KGRN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIBATKGRN
Cost30% weightA83HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA74HigherC46
Tradability15% weightD37HigherF16
Holdings10% weightB56HigherC40
Durability5% weightD36HigherD25

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IBAT and KGRN are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

IBAT ranks 4th and KGRN 16th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BIBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BFANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 15DRNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETFScore 30
  7. Rank 16FKGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETFScore 19

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IBATBiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

KGRNFKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF

In short

IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.

KGRN The clean-energy shelf is mostly global funds. KGRN goes one country deep: an MSCI index of roughly 50 Chinese environmental-technology names, run by a shop that does nothing but China.

Stated mandate

IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.

KGRN The fund seeks to follow the performance of the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index.

Why people hold it

  • IBAT 0.47% a year, cheaper than Global X's DRIV (0.68%) and Amplify's BATT (0.59%).
  • Buys the storage layer, not the showroom: battery technology, hydrogen, fuel cells and the materials that feed them.ishares.com
  • Global mandate, roughly 80 holdings: miners, chemical firms and equipment makers a US large-cap index never touches.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its battery and EV thematic group on our review.
  • KGRN Single-country by design: it follows the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while most clean-energy peers spread their bets across global markets.
  • Run by KraneShares, a China-focused specialist, and trading since 2017, so it carries a live record through several China market cycles.
  • About 50 holdings keeps the theme legible: China clean tech is the whole portfolio, not a sliver buried inside a global basket.

Worth knowing

  • IBAT One theme, one supply chain. Battery and materials demand drives the whole basket in the same direction at the same time.
  • BlackRock applies business involvement screens, so the portfolio is a filtered slice of the industry rather than the full map.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Not an income holding.
  • KGRN At 0.79% a year, it costs more than the clean-energy median of 0.59% and roughly double broad peers ICLN and FRNW at 0.39%.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's largest funds, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads and more cost around the trade itself.
  • One country, about 50 stocks: Chinese policy shifts, regulation and currency moves flow straight through with no global diversification to soften them.

Full IBAT profile⁠

Full KGRN profile⁠

IBAT vs KGRN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IBAT vs KGRN Cost

Overpaying KGRN vs IBAT

$5,756

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IBAT 0.47%

    $9,418

  • KGRN 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IBAT 0.47%
  • KGRN 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KGRN $15,174IBAT $9,418

Year by year

YearIBATKGRNOverpaying
10$847$1,405$558
20$3,261$5,331$2,070
30$9,418$15,174$5,756

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%IBAT, cheaper
  • 0.79%KGRN
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds

KGRN 16th cheapest of 16 funds

IBAT vs KGRN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.85%
KGRN 1.10%, better
Payout (12M)
IBAT $0.30
KGRN $0.23
Last payment
IBAT $0.18
KGRN $0.23
Ex-dividend
IBAT Jun 15, 2026
KGRN Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
IBAT Jun 18, 2026
KGRN Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
IBAT Twice a year
KGRN Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

IBATTwice a year · 5 paymentsAll IBAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Jun 11, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD
KGRNAnnual · 8 paymentsAll KGRN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2018 $0.36; Dec 27, 2019 $1.09; Dec 29, 2020 $0.003; Dec 29, 2021 $0.19; Dec 28, 2022 $0.44; Dec 18, 2023 $0.17; Dec 17, 2024 $0.33; Dec 22, 2025 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD

IBAT vs KGRN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IBAT 30.2%since Apr 2024KGRN 27.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IBAT 0.48since Apr 2024KGRN −0.14
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IBAT −28.2%since Mar 2024KGRN −63.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IBAT 1.57KGRN 0.62

IBAT and KGRN in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IBATBvsICLNA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KGRNFvsICLNA

    KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsFRNWA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KGRNFvsFRNWA

    KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsCNRGB

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KGRNFvsCNRGB

    KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.