IBAT ranks 4th and SMOG 10th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
IBAT vs SMOG
IBAT −0.17pt a year
0.47%0.64%
IBAT 14.4×the volume
22.7K1.58K
IBAT vs SMOG Performance
+8.4%+0.3%
- IBAT 0.47%, better
- SMOG 0.64%
- IBAT $51M
- SMOG $126M
- IBAT +8.4%, better
- SMOG +0.3%
- IBAT 0.89%
- SMOG 1.52%, better
- IBAT 95
- SMOG 60
- IBAT 22.7K sh, better
- SMOG 1.58K sh
- IBAT $33.25
- SMOG $131.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBAT | SMOG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | D30 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64 | A77Higher |
| Tradability | D37Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | B56 | B56 |
| Durability | D33 | B62Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. IBAT and SMOG are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBATB
SMOGC
In short
IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.
SMOG Clean energy from before it was a crowded shelf. SMOG has traded since 2007, and its global index reaches past wind and solar into the batteries, EVs, hydrogen and smart grids that move the electrons.
Stated mandate
IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.
SMOG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. The rules-based index targets renewable-energy companies and related low-carbon technologies, including wind, solar, hydro, hydrogen, biofuels, batteries, electric vehicles, smart grids, and efficiency materials.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBAT vs SMOG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBAT vs SMOG Cost
Overpaying SMOG vs IBAT
$3,120
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBAT 0.47%
$9,418
SMOG 0.64%
$12,538
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBAT | SMOG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,145 | $298 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $4,375 | $1,114 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $12,538 | $3,120 |
- 0.47%IBAT, cheaper
- 0.64%SMOG
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds
SMOG 12th cheapest of 16 funds
IBAT vs SMOG Dividends
- IBAT 0.89%
- SMOG 1.52%, better
- IBAT $0.30
- SMOG $2.03
- IBAT $0.18
- SMOG $2.03
- IBAT Jun 15, 2026
- SMOG Dec 22, 2025
- IBAT Jun 18, 2026
- SMOG Dec 26, 2025
- IBAT Twice a year
- SMOG Annual
Distribution history
IBAT vs SMOG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBAT 30.2%SMOG 20.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBAT 0.48SMOG 0.47
- Worst fall
- IBAT −30.7%SMOG −46.7%
- Market sensitivity
- IBAT 1.63SMOG 1.20
IBAT and SMOG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.64% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
