Skip to content

IBAT vs SMOG

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

IBATBNasdaq

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

SMOGCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IBAT −0.17pt a year

IBAT0.47%SMOG0.64%

Avg volume · 30D

IBAT 14.4×the volume

IBAT22.7KSMOG1.58K

IBAT vs SMOG Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+8.4%IBAT+0.3%SMOG

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. IBAT +8.4%. SMOG +0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%20%30%40%50%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IBAT 0.47%, better
SMOG 0.64%
Fund size
IBAT $51M
SMOG $126M
1Y total return
IBAT +8.4%, better
SMOG +0.3%
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.89%
SMOG 1.52%, better
Holdings
IBAT 95
SMOG 60
Avg volume (30D)
IBAT 22.7K sh, better
SMOG 1.58K sh
NAV per share
IBAT $33.25
SMOG $131.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IBAT: Cost 83, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 56, Durability 33. SMOG: Cost 30, Risk 77, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 56, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for IBAT, SMOG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIBATSMOG
Cost30% weightA83HigherD30
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64A77Higher
Tradability15% weightD37HigherD31
Holdings10% weightB56B56
Durability5% weightD33B62Higher

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IBAT and SMOG are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

IBAT ranks 4th and SMOG 10th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 67
  4. Rank 4BIBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BQCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index FundScore 55
  6. Rank 9CVCLNVirtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 10CSMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETFScore 45
  8. Rank 11CCTECGlobal X CleanTech ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IBATBiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

SMOGCVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

In short

IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.

SMOG Clean energy from before it was a crowded shelf. SMOG has traded since 2007, and its global index reaches past wind and solar into the batteries, EVs, hydrogen and smart grids that move the electrons.

Stated mandate

IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.

SMOG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. The rules-based index targets renewable-energy companies and related low-carbon technologies, including wind, solar, hydro, hydrogen, biofuels, batteries, electric vehicles, smart grids, and efficiency materials.

Why people hold it

  • IBAT 0.47% a year, cheaper than Global X's DRIV (0.68%) and Amplify's BATT (0.59%).
  • Buys the storage layer, not the showroom: battery technology, hydrogen, fuel cells and the materials that feed them.ishares.com
  • Global mandate, roughly 80 holdings: miners, chemical firms and equipment makers a US large-cap index never touches.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its battery and EV thematic group on our review.
  • SMOG Launched in 2007, one of the original clean energy ETFs, on the market long before the theme filled up with copycats.
  • Not just power plants. The index rules pull in wind, solar, hydro, hydrogen, biofuels, batteries, EVs, smart grids and efficiency materials.vaneck.com
  • Global and rules-based: roughly 60 names picked by a published index method, not a manager's hunches.

Worth knowing

  • IBAT One theme, one supply chain. Battery and materials demand drives the whole basket in the same direction at the same time.
  • BlackRock applies business involvement screens, so the portfolio is a filtered slice of the industry rather than the full map.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Not an income holding.
  • SMOG Costs 0.64% a year, the pricier end of the aisle. ICLN and FRNW run global clean energy mandates for 0.39%.
  • One of the thinner traders in its group, so the gap between buy and sell prices can run wider than at the category's giants.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year at most. Income is a side effect here, not the point.

Full IBAT profile⁠

Full SMOG profile⁠

IBAT vs SMOG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IBAT vs SMOG Cost

Overpaying SMOG vs IBAT

$3,120

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IBAT 0.47%

    $9,418

  • SMOG 0.64%

    $12,538

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IBAT 0.47%
  • SMOG 0.64%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SMOG $12,538IBAT $9,418

Year by year

YearIBATSMOGOverpaying
10$847$1,145$298
20$3,261$4,375$1,114
30$9,418$12,538$3,120

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%IBAT, cheaper
  • 0.64%SMOG
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds

SMOG 12th cheapest of 16 funds

IBAT vs SMOG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.89%
SMOG 1.52%, better
Payout (12M)
IBAT $0.30
SMOG $2.03
Last payment
IBAT $0.18
SMOG $2.03
Ex-dividend
IBAT Jun 15, 2026
SMOG Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
IBAT Jun 18, 2026
SMOG Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
IBAT Twice a year
SMOG Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IBATTwice a year · 5 paymentsAll IBAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 11, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
SMOGAnnual · 8 paymentsAll SMOG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.77; Dec 20, 2018 $0.34; Dec 21, 2020 $0.09; Dec 20, 2021 $0.71; Dec 19, 2022 $1.46; Dec 18, 2023 $1.75; Dec 23, 2024 $1.62; Dec 22, 2025 $2.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

IBAT vs SMOG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IBAT 30.2%since Apr 2024SMOG 20.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IBAT 0.48since Apr 2024SMOG 0.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IBAT −30.7%since Mar 2024SMOG −46.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IBAT 1.63SMOG 1.20

IBAT and SMOG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IBATBvsICLNA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMOGCvsICLNA

    VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsFRNWA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMOGCvsFRNWA

    VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsCNRGB

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMOGCvsCNRGB

    VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.